If so opinions?, if not you should it's a great satire on hitler coming back in today's society
>>8591651
I thought it was surprisingly good, much better than I thought it'd be. I like how it treats Hitler as a person and not an insane monster like how (((some))) would have you believe. Vernes clearly did his research, the speeches in the book really sound like something Hitler would actually say. I especially enjoyed the speech on responsibility he gives to the TV executives
>>8591651
We've had threads on this book a couple of times and from where I am the general consensus seems to be
>Hitler is well written character, very funny, and what he has to say about pop culture is spot on
>the side characters are meh, most are definitely passable but the German alt chick is especially annoying, maybe partly because she speaks an imitation of the Berliner dialect in the German book, not sure how this translates
>ending is meh, kind of out of nowhere
It actually shows a lot of parallels to the film because Hitler is also the most interesting character here, everyone else is meh, and the ending is fucking flat. Other than that, I feared they'd skew the original contents of the book and make it about left-right party politics, but actually far less political than that and is a reminder that WWII happened for a reason and if you don't think you have just a little bit of Hitler/'Hitlerdeutschland' in you then you're a fucking hypocrite.
>>8592517
Hitler is a*
but actually it's*
shit
but you get the point, and tl;dr: it is the funniest bestseller normalfag meme I ever picked up
>>8591651
it was better than the movie but still had lots of problems and needs a general knowledge of German pop culture
Doesn't the movie and books go against Germany's denazification laws? Like the ban of Nazi symbols in Strafgesetzbuchsection 86a.
>>8592545
I don't recall seeing any nazi flags in the film and you can't really "see" things in a book
Hitler is well written character, very funny, and what he has to say about pop culture is spot on