Hegel was misguided, the master-slave dialectic is an attempt to externalize what occurs within and between the self. The need for a mediator in the form of the 'other' is unnecessary. What he calls the self and the other are in actuality the self and 'the self which contradicts the self' (simultaneously both object and subject to each other). Self-consciousness is the continuous recognition of a new contradictory self, realized through the negation produced by the master-slave relationship of the prior self and the contradictory self, whose object of labour is a recreation of itself. Need I say more?
Really weird, I read the master slave dialectic yesterday and had the same thought. I think Hegel did too though.
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1qp0mEdnIe7
I thought that was exactly what he meant.
I thought all of what was described in the master-slave dialectic occurred within the individual
>>8588855
>>8588877
So that's the general interpretation of it? fuck ok. The course I'm reading it for frames it within marxism, so the implication they've been running with is that this literally occurs between an individual and:
(other individual)
(ISA/RSA)
Like I thought I was just dead wrong cause no one else in the fucking class could apply it in a non-literal way and the profs just went with it.
Hegel was a pseud.
>>8588898
do you go to sfu
>>8588939
nah canada though