Shadilay, friends. What ideologies would you consider yourself?

This is going to be a bad thread full of insecure teenagers. I am going to hide this thread.

I'm an authoritarian nationalist

>>8582327
I am a dumb fucking faggot

What urges people to categorize and apply these labels on themselves? I remember myself being a similar teenager, but now I just can't understand.

>>8582328
>>8582335
>implying you faggots are original or intelligent enough to carve your own path

I'm vegan

>>8582335
When you don't have a personality or any thoughts or hobbies, you need to define yourself with labels you don't even understand.

>>8582327
>Buddhist
>Nietzschean
>Humanist
Boy are you confused

Old-guard libertarian monarchist.

You can't freely choose your ideology.

>>8582327
>a Buddhist
>a Nietzschean

That's a very peculiar mix.

i'm a suicidal nihilist

>>8582327
I'm a libertarian MGTOW white nationalist and a secular Rationalist

>>8582327
This is a really bad troll post bust everyone still falls for it. I'm somewhat surprised and somewhat not.

>>8582327
I take ideas that I like and implement them into my thoughts and actions, if they are reasonably sound and appeal to me in some way.

So, Syncretism would be a good definition.

>>8582327

Nietzscheanism and Buddhism are not ideologies.

>>8582335

People have a need to identify with something bigger than themselves, and to 'brand' themselves with this 'something.' Psychologically speaking it's identical to the reason people become brand-loyal, or fans of musical acts in a way that goes beyond merely enjoying the music (i.e. wearing the band's shirts and such). It provides people with a shortcut to developing an identity. It further provides social benefits; identifying yourself as belonging to a group improves your standing with other members of that group, which may lead to opportunities for professional and social advancement.

File: image.jpg (29KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 480x360px

>>8582327
Im_a_50_terabyte_selfevolving_neural_network_double_backflip_off_the_high_platform.

Im_not_a_swan dive.

>>8582335
/thread

Com'on kiddies, show us the words you've learned.

File: swordbroad.png (201KB, 850x850px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 850x850px

>>8582327
A Divine Right of Kings Monarchist and Catholic that supports Distributism.

>>8582335
Because it makes related the basics of your beliefs simpler and faster. Rather than launching into a glossary of Subsidiarity, Solidarity, etc. I just say 'Distributist' as then explain how I differ from the default.

>>8582335

The same reason why people feel the need to plaster their automobiles in various bumper stickers.

I'm a Liberal, a proud American, a Democrat, and a secular humanist.

>>8583158

So you call yourself something you're not and then force some monotonous speech on the poor listener who dared to ask so you can appear like some special snowflake? You sound like a shitty person.

Post-Marxist nihilist

not having an ideology because the stupidity of labeling yourself - the newest "crazy" ideology to hit the streets! Make sure you ascribe to this one quick before the growing trend fades into obscurity.

File: 薫梢01 by ヨルノトノ.jpg (120KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 600x600px

>>8582327
Homeric Literalist.

>>8583176
Ah, the poor reading comprehension /lit/ is famous for has not left, I see.
Quite the opposite, lackwit.
Rather than force others to bear the endless droning of a position paper I say 'I'm a Distributist" and *if they ask* I can explain particular points.
These folks
>>8583085
>>8582335
>>8582368
are the sorts to spend 45 minutes explaining themselves (when no one asks) because they feel they are special.

I'm a democratic liberal, I support Hillary despite these trumptards, I'm a feminist, and I believe in the equality of all people

I consider myself naught.

You must like Synecdoche, NY.

>>8582327
you forgot 'virgin'

Nietzsche's done a good job of converting me over the past year, although I still find it very hard to shake a lot of my /pol/ tendencies. I'm definitely drawn to the 'right' side of Nietzsche - golden laughter as I wage war with my enemies, etc.

>>8583248
What about Nietzsche is un/pol/?

>>8583152
>>8583158
>Disributism

This is the first I've heard of this.
So it's like a Middle Ages economy, where the division of labor is expanded throughout the population anod there are no governments or corporations? Who, what media source, is pushing this these days? Or did you discover this on your own and decide to run with it?

>>8583273
It's the standard for highbrow memed up neo-neo-Christians.

>>8583273
Just idiots romanticising the medieval period that they barely understand.

I'm an American, a patriot, and other than that I have no ideology. I'm a pure rationalist.

File: quickmeme.com.jpg (10KB, 210x240px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 210x240px

If anyone is wondering, this is in fact a meme post; however, it was inspired by a true story.

Yesterday, in my Philosophy class, my professor claimed Buddhism was both atheistic and humanistic. A student in the same class prior said he was both a Nietzschean and a Buddhist. My autism was triggered and I felt a good meme post would help me vent it.

>>8583273
>So it's like a Middle Ages economy
Not at all.
The core concepts are a focus on smaller firms, cooperatives, and employee-owned firms over large conglomerates; reduction or elimination of mutuum loans that charge interest; the replacement of contemporary unions with a union system that includes managers and owners; and a focus on more local management and regulation of business.
>No government or corporations
When would that be, the Neolithic?
If you want to see what contemporary Distributism looks like, try here
http://www.mondragon-corporation.com/eng/
It is a large corporation run by Distributist concepts and it is competing quite well.

>>8582327
Intellectualist labels are the ultimate meme.

File: 1426892645223.png (319KB, 803x688px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 803x688px

>>8582327
>What ideologies would you consider yourself?

A decadent most likely.

>>8583171
Word.

Being a dyed-in-the-wool FDR Democrat, I prefer progressive to liberal, but it's a big tent. Either way, fuck that Grumpy Ol' Party. They haven't had a decent man in charge since Ike. Maybe they'll come to their senses someday. Hope is fading fast for that.

>>8582339

<carving your own path
<using lables invented by others
<not breaking confirmity
<not inventing own language to break chains of oppression stemming from original Babeling

fucking pseuds

>>8583254
His anti-nationalism, anti-populism and his dislike for anti-semitism to name a few. He thought in racial terms but not like how it is done over in /pol/.

>>8582399
Sez you

>>8583205
>>8583600

Since when was cuckoldry an ideology?

>>8583609
>lables
>confirmity
>posting on /lit/

>break chains of oppression
You do you

>>8583302
Buddism is nearly completly apthic to human affiars and suffering.

>>8582327
ITT: Spergs who 'resist labelling' but will argue endlessly about which genre genre fiction belongs within

>>8583628
Not even married. Even if I was married your feeble attempt at insult would fail miserably. Is that all you've got?

Psychological hedonist
Center-left
Agnostic-atheist
Capitalist

My ideology is autism

the worst kind of hypocrite
left wing heart
capitalist wallet

>>8583254
The /pol/ mentality is full of ressentiment and slave morality, lets be real.

>>8583691
>apthic
Can someone tell me what this was supposed to say

>>8583808
Of course. What I meant to ask was "What does /pol/ find disagreeable in Nietzsche?" not "What does Nietzsche find disagreeable in /pol/?"

Everyone understands that Nietzsche is a descriptive, not prescriptive philosopher, right?

>>8583813
if you're serious, i reckon he meant *apathetic

>>8583886
Big N would loathe /pol/ on numerous grounds like:
• the idea of nationality and nationalism and even culture mattering; Nietzsche renounced his citizenship and never took anoher citizenship, remaining a non-citizen the rest of his life.
• "all antisemites should be shot"
• all of their moralizing

I also feel hemd have a problem with the way they place all the blame for problems in life on others and romanticize psychopaths and hate crimes

Oh also in the Gay Science he makes it pretty clear that those who try to use and gain power in negative ways that harm others actually display a lack of power and that they're always inferior to those who use and gain power in "good" ways

>>8582327
Free market capitalist
Agnostic theist
Center right social conservative
Libertarian but fascism especially Italian fascism has a nice appeal to me

>>8584006
>fascism has a nice appeal to me
After all, it's worked out so well in the past. What could possibly go wrong?

File: ayn rand+.jpg (24KB, 288x288px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 288x288px

I'm stuck between following a combination philosophy mixture of Nietzsche, Striner and Ayn Rand, which is just an overarching individualistic philosophy I guess.

If I had to give a name to my ideology, I'm more of a less rigid Objectivist.

Gnostic Christian

>>8582327
Im poor with little proesptcs of becoming rich so im a democratic socialist.

I'm a Paganist center-Hegelian.

Agnostic Atheist, but raised on Pagan rituals and ethics.
Pro-AI, Pro-globalisation
Privacist, Humanist
Absurdist/Existentialist

>>8582335
I bet now you're going to ask why people join political parties.

File: wK2zo7RJmAyW2b_yzZsrApisz6pNcy64gUkPR2XX2tI.jpg (101KB, 512x768px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 512x768px

>>8583281
Like a /mu/ of divinity students? Please tell me that's a thing.

File: tumblr_nk14o4MHCE1qblbi2o1_500.jpg (96KB, 480x711px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 480x711px

a realist

>>8583190
>are the sorts to spend 45 minutes explaining themselves (when no one asks) because they feel they are special.
This. I know people like this. They have postures PRETTY similar to a lot of labels but won't recognize it because they want to feel specials or some shit like that. It makes communication worse at time because they're saying something a posture has been saying for long ago thinking they're saying something else.

Socialdemocrat and materialist.

File: 500.jpg (50KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 500x500px

free-market egoist

>>8582327
>To begin, I'm a Buddhist, a Nietzschean, and a Humanist.
Oh so you're in high school?

>>8582327
PURE IDEOLOGY

File: 1474276218789.gif (437KB, 245x118px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 245x118px

I'm a Democrat, a Liberal, and a believer in the power of the free market plus intelligent interventions by the State. I believe in Social Liberalism and economic Conservatism. I'm also a believer in self-reliance and independence, but people who need assistance should get it. It is shameful to leave a countryman behind. And lastly I'm against divisive bullshit like racism and sexism.

Of course everyone on this degenerate website is in their youthful contrarian phases and still sees themselves as essentially separate from the system.

im a libertarian stalinist OP

>>8584457
based
>>8585502
lol
>>8584161
lol
>>8583749
lol
>>8583205
lol
>>8583180
lol
>>8583171
LOL
>>8582438
me :/
>>8582327
lol

>>8582425
Peculiar, which is to say unsustainable.

File: 1472991584603.gif (3MB, 400x180px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 400x180px

>>8582333
oh man god bless

I'm a daoist egoist

>>8582394
>>8582425
Why? both of them put self-improvement into the centre of their ideologies.
Neither of them care about silly gods.

I would say they are quite paralel philosophies. The only contradiction is maybe the principle of compassion in Buddhism vs the refusal of slave morality by nietzscheian philosophy. But that one is only seemingly contradictory.

File: 35412355_p0.jpg (1MB, 1729x879px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1729x879px

>>8582327
Roman Catholic throne-and-altar distributist thomist.

>>8585712
is that you Richard

Socratic ignorant.

>>8585714
No, but this is
>>8585712
Peter?

Those all contradict eachother pretty horribly.

I'm a Gamer, but I am also a Feminist. Yeah, we exist, get over it! I believe in the progress of Science and human Reason, and because of this I am a Humanist. I'm a Libertarian as well, because an Authoritarian Government restricts human Reason and has put us back into the Dark Ages. Most of all, I am an Atheist, because I cannot understand how somebody could ever go so far as commit genocide of something they cannot know for certain. I am certain there is no God (science has proven it!) and I will kill if necessary to defend these objective ideals of Humanism, Reason, and true Democracy.

>>8582350
Why do vegans always feel the need to tell everyone about their stupid diet.

Jesus christ, no one asked.

>>8586421
This is a fallacy, since you only notice the vegans that tell you they are vegan. I am a vegan, and I tell no one.

>>8584254
No, it's literally the social teaching of the Catholic church.
Belloc and Chesterton are the most famous defenders of the concept.

Catholic. Main influences are thomists, so Aquinas, MacIntyre, Feser, Copleston.

>>8586433
>I am a vegan, and I tell no one.

Peak veganism.

>>8586387
That's the point.

>>8582327
Anarcho-pol potist

Anarcho-Tyrannist; Spiritual Disestablishmentarian and Anticapitalist Barrista.

(I also consider myself a Deleuzian but that's another story)

national socialist

>>8584020
fuck me leftists make themselves easy targets

>>8584037
>less rigid
I think the word you are looking for is flaccid

straight cis white male

>christian anarchist
<3 kierkegaard and tolstoy

File: yang.png (64KB, 154x251px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 154x251px

>>8585600
Preach.

I'm a consumerist sheep that thinks it's special by labelling itself on the internet. Literally tumblr-tier behaviour.

File: generalstrike[1].jpg (98KB, 366x603px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 366x603px

Anarcho-Syndicalism
pls no bully ;-;

File: 220px-Georges_Sorel.jpg (11KB, 220x289px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 220x289px

>>8587568
>not national syndicalism

>>8587565
I'm pretty sure that most of those labels here are a joke.

Non practicing lutheran.
Libertarian left.
Yeah I'm pretty plain

>>8582394
are you retarded? I cant think of a more compatible series of ideologies.

fucking explain yourself so I can destroy your argument

File: 1443364322916.jpg (55KB, 708x949px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 708x949px

>>8582327
You could have just said you were a teenager.

>>8586997
No, less rigid.
Nietzsche, Ayn Rand and Striner mostly agree on the same individualistic base. Uniting them is rather satisfying.

What's up with that hat?

File: John Calvin smug.png (190KB, 300x326px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 300x326px

Calvinist, anarcho-capitalist

>>8586421
Because this is an ideological thread and the person responded with their ideology...

The greater question is why do many herbivores feel so threatened by another person's eating habits? I rarely mention I'm vegan and when I do the other party often feels a need to prove that my choices are inherently "wrong." Not like I attacked them in the least, it's just a really strange psychological reaction people have that seems to play on really old archetypes of hunter-gatherer relationships.

>>8585600
That seems perplexing.

>>8582327
Taoist-stoic with way too much humanist idealism.

>>8586997
B T F O