My reading style usually involves having one big ambitious book which I interlude with shorter 'fun' sci-fi, fantasy type books.
Ive just finished Ulysses and I am unsure on wherever or not to read Jerusalem or The Crying Lot of 49, closely followed by Gravity's Rainbow next.
I already own Jerusalem, whilst an unfinished book taunts me I dont want to waste my time on it if its not good, I'd also love to get into Pynchon.
Anybody read both and can offer advice?
>>8581905
I don't really know anything about Jerusameme, but you can read Lot 49 in one or two sittings because it's really short.
Making your own decisions is considered a sign of a well developed and adult mind.
>>8581905
Moore said something like "Thomas Pynchon's V. was my first experience with a real masterpiece. It shows in Watchmen. Most writers seem to prefer V. over GR, since it's just incredible that it got published at all.
>>8582542
that quote was supposed to end at "masterpiece"
>>8581905
Crying49 is one of those short-off reads. I'd start with Gravity's Rainbow before Jerusalem since it's had a big influence on Moore.
Jerusalem is not worth your time. In 250 pages in right now and it is god-awful.
>>8582555
>where do you think you are.gif
You don't need to pretend you have read something to say it's bad here
>>8581905
Jerusalem is really long.
>>8581905
if you haven't read any Pynchon at all, you should probably not start with Gravity's Rainbow
>>8584199
wrong
I did and the book treated me well
I'm super smart though