and why it exists as a sub field in our beautiful field of philosophy?
isn't it just pseudo mathematics?
>>8529592
No.
wat
no idea. they've been totally invalidated. there's that one thing some analytic philosopher came up with that's actually been useful in the natural sciences or something, but other than that they have literally done nothing but spend a lot of words responding to each other's retarded arguments. unlike continentals they don't even produce interesting writing. truly a complete waste of space.
>can someone justify anything
t. Continental
>>8529560
Because trying to have a definition and nail down a concept so people can argue for or against it is bad in the eyes of continentals, who like to keep things greasy so they can never be proven wrong