>unreliable narrators
>unreliable readers
>unreliable writers
unreliable shitposters
>unreliable frog arrows
>reliable fellater
Isn't the fact that author makes the narrator "unreliable" make him more reliable than any other? How can we know any narrator is to be trusted, in any work? If anything, unreliable narrators let us know that they are not to be trusted.
>>8514569
But if he's narrating how do you know he's lying?
>>8514569
this is stupid.
I wish I could force all writers to write from 3rd person limited omniscient perspective. Then they might actually develop some sense of plot, narrative and story structure.
>>8515962
you should be more open minded
>>8515962
We don't take kindly to jewr kind around here. Nor anywhere else
Post examples of unreliable narrators done right
>>8516502
Holden Caulfield
>unreliable boards when it comes to thread quality
>First-person narration
>>8516502Umineko
>>8516918
>unreliable broads when it comes to thread quality
I didn't marry a seamstress for shoddy woollens like these
>"non-linear storyline" when the author clearly made everything up as they went along
>>8516502
Kinbote.
Wittgenstein's Mistress did it right
>>8517821
Underrated
>>8517823
or it would have been ultra dull in linear form so they had it by moving shit around