Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 5369608.jpg (409KB, 2500x844px) Image search:
[Google]
409KB, 2500x844px
>write villainous character as the antagonist
>audience is derisive of the character and condemns the actions and goals ("Whatever the reasons, what (s)he's doing is wrong and (s)he should be punished. Not to mention his/her toxic personality.")
>write villainous character as the protagonist
>audience sympathizes with the character and will even defend or support the actions and goals, to the point of being derisive of other characters for "getting in the way" ("His/her actions may be "evil" but are totally reasonable/understandable/justified. And he/she's not really such a bad person.")
Can /lit/ explain this?
>>
Sounds like a problem with fanboys and girls getting overly attached to mary sues in genreshit
>>
>>8510974
That's probably the case but still amusing.
>>
>>8510966
Gosh, it's almost like the way you present things radically changes their meaning to your audience.
What do you think adverts, propaganda, and political spin is for?
>>
People are fickle.
>>
>we don't sympathise and empathise with a character whose perspective and personal motives are unknown to us
>we do sympathise and empathise with a character whose perspective and personal motives are known to us
Oh gee I wonder why
>>
>>8511720
>antagonist's perspective and personal motives are always unknown
No.
>>
Nice strawman OP
>>
except Light was the good guy
>>
>>8512985
Was Light /lit/?
At least he wrote daily
He was more /lit/ than L that's for sure
>>
>>8512997
wasn't he in law school at university
I guess that's /lit/
>>
>he didn't support Light
what a fag, I bet you don't even idolize Duterte
>>
Light would vote Trump tbph. He was very redpilled.
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1