Is this book really the most complex book of all time?

no it's not

>2 / 0 / 1 / 2
fuck off retard

File: You not Smart.png (379KB, 1365x656px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1365x656px

>>8495984
>>8496146
>>8497361
Wow all that samefagging... you think you Smart huh?
>saging with a pic

I mean, it's not the most complex book of all time but it's complex, sure.

>>8495984
yes, absolutely
anyone who says otherwise is a total plebeian

File: ttag.jpg (378KB, 1920x1080px)

378KB, 1920x1080px

>>8497440
defending a hopelessly derivative novel with a shitty shoop

File: a0f.jpg (234KB, 778x645px)

234KB, 778x645px

roses are red
violets are blue
dhalgren sucks
your kneecaps, mine soon

Is it more complex than Ulysses?

>>8495984
You appear to have purchased a children's book retelling of Dhalgren, and thus have memed yourself retardedly. So, yes and yes, I guess.

Dhalgren is great, and it is complex. It isn't close to as difficult as Ulysses, but people who predominantly read genre fiction consider it to be. Because they read genre fiction. They also think Ursula K Le Guin is an esoteric literary labyrinth weaver

>>8497558
>defending yourself from being accused of faggotry while being such an enormous faggot

>>8495984
are you just posting this because of that guy on /r/infinitejest?
(I've literally seen this book mentioned twice on the internet in the last five years: right here, and right there.)

>>8498398
Dhalgren does sporadically get mentioned on here, actually.

Also,
>going to r/infinitejest

File: dean-ellis_dhalgren_ny-bantam-1976_y8554.jpg (465KB, 1213x2099px)

465KB, 1213x2099px

>>8495984
Not the most complex book of all time, not even the most complex sci-fi novel. Good read though, Delaney is writes much better prose than is typical of sf. Some pretty hot sex in it, too.

Also what an awful cover. Here's the real one.

>>8498275
thanks for the (((you))) but I'm not OP ya goofy nig nog

>>8498480
never said you were. I said you were the faggot