David Benatar

I thought it was good, a good argument. And I know arguments.

>>8455685
Makes sense if you accept general utilitarian premises, I think.

I've read parts of it but it didn't interest me enough to read all of it, since I don't accept such premises.

>>8455685
What did you think of the argument against reading this book?

>>8455727
What was the argument against reading the book?

>>8455745
1) antinatalism is always a serious harm
2) its always wrong to not have children
3) all children should be had

see what I did there? I meak argument.

>>8455745

*posts smug animu face*

>he does thing I don't like
>he does it unironically
>thing I don't like is just a meme
>you fell for it (ha)
>you must be a [insert buzzword]

>>8455768
Would you not have to back up claim 1 though?