Is Nietzsche the original meme/

>>8449274
No, that would be free will

>>8449274
language is the original meme

if you read nietzsche you would know that

>>8449274
Nietzsche is very much not a meme in terms of his work and its impact though, he basically started the contemporary era of philosophy by burying the rest of philosophy under a heap of his own shit. But he was never too stuffy or serious when doing this, he just casually pauses to take a shit on it once in awhile until you've gone through all of his works and notice that there is now a massive mountain of shit laying atop the once beautiful edifice of philosophy which prevents us from ever finding it as beautiful as it once was no matter how much muck is removed. Every time we look at this edifice, no matter if it is cleaned off or apparently rebuilt entirely anew, we remember the stink he slathered all over the original copy.

>>8449323

>Nietzsche was a metaphysical shitposter

Fitting tbqh the envy of Australia.

>>8449323
What did he do that was so bad?

>>8449323
Naw, enlightenment shit works great for hard, testable sciences, but it utterly fails at understanding human actions. Nietzsche shows how stupid it is to try to manufacture perfect humans by education, asceticism, religious morality etc.

THE CRINGIEST SAVAGE ON THIS ENTIRE PLANET GOES MAD FROM AIDS AND BLAMES SOCIETY(THE FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE RANT)

>>8449336
He was an anti-metaphysical shitposter for the most part. WTP can be seen as metaphysics if you think his notes were stuff he believed rather than ideas he was playing around with.

>>8449397
He basically deconstructs the entire philosophical endeavor as nothing more than an expression of will to power, it's a bunch of nerds trying to use the only power they have to control people. He also undermines the very basis of philosophy by contesting both the nature of and the value of truth, which ostensibly is what all philosophy aims to get at.

Just as philosophy prior to the 20th century can be seen as footnotes to Plato, with Hegel producing the ultimate expression of this mode of philosophy, most relevant philosophy after Nietzsche can be seen as footnotes to his work, and the ultimate expression of this may be centuries away.

No. He's just babby's first cool 19th century european, black and white photograph, big mustache, serious thinking philosopher who killed metaphysics and truth with his writings, while coming up with his own truths and values XD XD He's the starting point (Heidegger being the next main one) most of the french thinkers of the 20 century - structuralists, post structuralists, deconstructionists, post moderns - all that shit.

>>8450339
pretty much this

>>8450381

>He's the starting point (Heidegger being the next main one) most of the french thinkers of the 20 century - structuralists, post structuralists, deconstructionists, post moderns - all that shit.

Wrong. Nietzsche would be rolling in his grave at 20th century """"philosophy"""".

Anyone who seriously reads Nietzsche can't help but conclude that post-modernists/structuralists/etc are sullying his ideal.

>>8450339
>He also undermines the very basis of philosophy by contesting both the nature of and the value of truth, which ostensibly is what all philosophy aims to get at.
That's about it? It seems like a shoddy building.