What do you think of my antiques?

They don't look like antiques. Look early 20th century at the latest. Early 1900's stuff isn't worth anything more than modern printing unless it's a rare edition.

>>8444744
I made no claims about them being rare or expensive.

>>8444744

when I read the OP, I initially thought like this guy. But then I thought about it some more and then I realized that the OP >>8444751 is actually right.

Try actually going in an antique shop sometime. legit "antiques" start circa 50 years old and then go back from there, although of course there's plenty of things in antique shops that are younger than that. There's also a lot of common crap, just like any store. To the OP's point, just because something looks to be common crap (just like the OP's book collection) does not mean that it does not literally count as an antique, say.

>>8444716
These look like books that they sell at Value Village.

I don't think.