>would of
>should of
>could of
>could of
yep
The way I like to make my chicken breasts is quite simple. There is the normal way, and, my friends, the cultured way. Shakespeare once said, "you are what you eat." And I'm not a chicken breast. So I have to make sure that I'm eating something far more masculine. What I do is this. I freeve the chicken breast until it is solid, and then I drink a few cups of water. Then I pee all over the breast: it is actually sterile, and warms the outside while giving the center a rock hard core. The outside represents the male ego, steamy and sterile, sterilized by an even feminized society. The center is the male id -- cold, hard, determined. This becomes an icon of my very being: and then I must eat it. But the outer layer is still quite wet, so I use the male body's natural napkin, the scrotum, as a drying agent. This is because like any self affirmed male, I respect my natural Dasein. The chicken breast is now at the crossroads between food and thought: and while some might take the fork in the road and eat the breast, I choose to watch it for a while before consumption. It is cold, it is perfect, it is Me.
East would of
>use of then rather than than
>there or there're instead of their
>>8444713
>your and you're
>it's its
>its it's
>>8445037
>than than
>using apostrophes to indicate plurality
>>8445492
Sometimes this is accurate usage, e.g. "the 80's".
>>8445525
Using '80s' is more correct and neater.
>>8444713
>off of
>juxtaposed with
>Loosing my temper