DG

Bumping for ontological proofs

Fuck off pissboi

>>8436180
Why do you say this?

what it is, is retarded

>>8436486
No u are

>>8435704
On Method was shit

>>8436929
just like you

IT'S ALMOST AS OF THERE IS A TRADITION OF THOUGHT RUNNING FROM PLATO THROUGH THE MODERN ERA TO THE PRESENT DAY

SO WEIRD DUDE

>>8437329
Wow who would dare to say that

>>8435704
This argument is Anselm not Descartes.

>>8438473
Despite similarities, Descartes' version of the argument differs from Anselm's in important ways. The latter's version is thought to proceed from the meaning of the word “God,” by definition, God is a being a greater than which cannot be conceived. Descartes' argument, in contrast, is grounded in two central tenets of his philosophy — the theory of innate ideas and the doctrine of clear and distinct perception. He purports not to rely on an arbitrary definition of God but rather on an innate idea whose content is “given.”

>>8435704
You will find many simmilarities between moderns and greeks, and moderns and post-moderns.