Any good editions of Nabokovs Lolita that don't have girls/women/bodyparts on the front? Except for the Olympia first press edition that I could literally buy my own physical lolita for in Asia.
>>8428745
Why do you want such an edition?
>>8428787
I just really like simple covers, as well as reading a book with "lolita" in big font over a tweens bust isn't my cup of tea
>>8428791
Faggot
Penguin modern classics is a jar of flowers I believe. I can't remember who painted it.
>>8428952
Thanks, it looks better than most.
>>8428745
>>8428791
>sn't my cup of tea
The people who need to read more always find an excuse not to do so.
>>8428745
Like Guernica
>>8429285
I am purchasing a book, does that imply i'm not simultaneously reading another? I agree with the sentiment of there always being an excuse not to do something, but in this case you're missing the mark.
>>8429313
The fact that you have misunderstood me means I'm hitting the mark.
>>8429324
How so? I understand why they choose the cover, but i'd rather just have something simple and clean.
Library of America edition
>>8428791
Find yourself a first edition of the book