What should I read before reading Heidegger's Being and Time?

>>8419317
All memes aside, the Greeks. Particularly the Pre-Socratics. Also Kant, Hegel, general phenomenology. Seriously, just fucking go through chronologically. Will you end up understanding Heidegger? Probably not, but hey! You've got 2,000 years of thought under your belt.

>>8419323
For the record, I've read a majority of the "required" reading for Being and Time and I stopped pretty early on because it was borderline insufferable - this is from someone who enjoys Phenomenology of Spirit and Foucault.

>>8419332
Phenom. of Spirit gets a bad rap. It's difficult, but manageable. But I found my self absolutely frazzled by Being and Time. Don.t know what to tell you other than slog through it. Secondary literature perhaps? Dreyfus is apparently one of the top authorities on H.

What is Metaphysics - Heidegger

Mein Kampf

>>8419392
>haha do i fit in guys?

>>8419317
just drop acid tbqh