Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
META THREAD: New Sticky? 2016-08-17 08:19:45 Post No. 8406957
[Report] Image search: [Google]
META THREAD: New Sticky? 2016-08-17 08:19:45 Post No. 8406957
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: harry2.png (136KB, 319x265px) Image search:
[Google]
136KB, 319x265px
Hey guys,
I've been thinking that it's time for a new sticky at the top of our board. Not necessarily a replacement of the old one (though we could work that info into a new, just longer one) but at the very least a new or updated sticky.
Why is this necessary?
Because of the 24/7 /pol/ threads usually answered in one-two posts. You know them. The threads with OPs like: "What is some redpilled literature?" "What books should I read about the fall of the West?" "Was Schopenhauer right about women?" "Give me some books that will expose women for what they are," etc.
If we consolidate a lot of the info we have into one post, we could rid ourselves forever of these banal and pointless threads.
What do you think?
>>
We've already got a new one.
>>
>>8406957
>implying the /pol/tards will stop shitting up this board because you ask
Ignoring them is the best you can do.
>>
>>8406957
How about just a rule for mods: delete threads that aren't about books
>>
Report and ignore /pol/ threads, don't need a new sticky.
>>
I feel as if ur proposal turns pol's retarded ideology into lit's standard by having a sticky
Seems undemocratic
>>
>>8406957
why does he always look so fucked in his pictures
>>
What happened to the sticky we already had that told /pol/ to fuck off and go read? We should just put that back up again. If we give them the information they want they might actually stay here.
>>
>>8406957
Atleast /pol/acks who actually try to make it related to literature are better than the marx-fags who just want's to ramble about politics (and gets away with it).
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1