So how good is Dhalgren?

>>8398382

I have read both..its no where near as hard as Ulysses

its a great book

>>8398401
agreed

>>8398401

I couldn't get through Dhalgren but I liked Ulysses. I just didn't get what the kid was doing in the city, what the deal with the bbc guy was, why there was so much gross sex, stuff like that. I want to like Delany's books and they're well written but every one gives me a literal headache. They're also really gay, and that leather stuff doesn't appeal to me at all.

The only work of his I like is "Aye, and Gomorrah" but that's only a few pages.

>>8398382
It's certainly complex and it's definitely a good book, but it's not as hard as Ulysses

Dhalgren - holograms = Hogg