Where do I start with Baudrillard?
You watch the Matrix
dont
>>8395342
>"""thinkers"""
this applies to him more than just about anyone. he is the epitome of postmodern obscurantist posturing
>continentals
Why do people always ask when to start with these kinds of philosophy figures?
You would have thought that if someone was ready to 'start' with Baudrillard they would have enough knowledge in philosophy already that they wouldn't need to ask /lit/
>>8395342
Transparecy of Evil, that is his most relevant work to today's world
Simulacra and Simulation.
at the same place you start with any other french typical pseudointellectual marxist imbecile: nowhere.
The Gay Commie Marxist or How I Brainwashed Your Kids
At the end of a noose.
>>8395393
really gurl? you came that way?
>>8396831
This basically.