Feminist literature thread

>>8389180
Schopenhauer's 'On Women'.

That's all. Read this essay and you'll be redpilled to the true "essence" of women, and realize how inferior they are to men.

WOmen aren't as ontologically 'there' as men, they aren't properly inscribed into the symbolic text. They have no depth, no real existential angst or anguish, they are superficial, dumb, and selfish.

No woman can truly love, truly be ethical, or truly be loyal, because their thoughts do not extend further than to Chad cock and handbags and shoes.

To encourage feminism is to encourage white genocide. Giving women the right to choose sexual partners invariably ends up in interracial relationships and brown babies because women's judgment is rash, naive, and down-right dumb.

Women are meant to take care of domestic matters and raise children, and THAT'S FINAL.

>>8389180
Lol to discussing feminism on /lit/

Barbara Ehrenreich is good. Not sure if it is even feminist literature though, not very political.

>>8389180
The Second Sex
Gender Trouble

>>8389364
/lit/ is probably the only place likely to get good feminist discussion

better than echo chambers where there's no quality control