Zizek Reading Guide?

>>8371174

Phenomenology of Spirit
greater Logic
Philosophy of History

The German Ideology
Theses
Contribution
Capital I, II, III

Introductory Lecturas
Three Essays
Psychopathology of Everyday Life
Jokes and the Unc.
A few case studies (Dora, Wolf Man, Rat Man)
Totem and Taboo
The Ego and the Id
Beyond the Pleasure Principle

Écrits
Four Fundamental Concepts
seminar on Transference

now, that's just the main figures themselves. then there's the army of their interpreters. as you can tell im not as familiar with Lacan

Zizi for babbys :https://www.amazon.com/Introducing-Slavoj-Zizek-Graphic-Guide/dp/1848312938
But actually not toooo bad to get a first impression..

You guys have it backwards. Reading Marx, Hegel, and Lacan to understand Zizek is like reading Darwin and Lucretius to better understand Richard Dawkins.

>>8371214
>no interpretation of dreams, no civilization and Its discontents
are you dumb bruv?
you can literally replace all of freud just with these two, apart from maybe totem and wolfman

>>8371214
haha ya let me just start with hegel real quick nno problem gunna just start reading hegel today what could go wrong

>>8371231

Yeah, my bad on Interpretation, don't know how it slipped my mind. But excluding Civ was deliberate; it is a dumbed down footnote to BPP

>>8371222

Zizek' entire work is in response to problems opened up by these thinkers. His style of argument is virtually illegible without a background in dialectics.