/lit/ ask an intellectual who has read nearly every relevant

what's in my pocket?

>>8368318
Another pocket.

>>8368316
u gay?

>>8368323
I'll leave it up to you to decide.

>>8368321
wrong

>>8368316
What relevant literature have no you read yet?

>>8368321
Why are the bourgeois so lazy? They have such debility. They are languid and their thoughts are obscured by social media.

The fact that you crammed all works of literature in the relevant/irreleant categories shows your narrow understanding of the medium and general closemindedness. I have nothing to ask of you, philistine

>>8368316
what is the meaning of life?

was that a foot fetish thing in East of Eden?

>>8368316
how do u feel about kierkegaard's supposed refutation of hegel's assertion that there exist only relative opposites?

>>8368330
Nothing. I've read them all.

>>8368333
>trips
well played

>>8368316
First of all, I'd like to thank you for giving back to this community by giving us an opportunity to expand our minds. My question is as follows:

Hypothetically, if you were gay and had access to a fully functional portal gun, which activity would you be more tempted to attempt: 1) performing anal sex on your own butthole, or 2) performing oral sex on your dong?

File: 1461899208132.png (98KB, 612x491px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 612x491px

>>8368316
how do I get a gf???

>>8368333
There are works of literature that have shaped our modern world, and there are works of literature that haven't. The former is relevant, the latter is irrelevant. How does that show narrow understanding and close mindedness? Elaborate, please.

>>8368386
be good-looking

File: manlet pepe.png (133KB, 396x492px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 396x492px

>>8368393

>>8368337
Okay, your original post says:
>read nearly every relevant literature

So how could you have read them all when your original post says "nearly"?

>>8368376
OP pls see this one! I hope it doesn't get buried by other comments!

>>8368376
First of all, I'd appreciate it if your next question is about literature.

And to answer your question, I would choose to second one since I don't want to damage my butthole.

>>8368414
I think I've read them all, I was only being skeptical. Maybe in the future I'll find a relevant book that I haven't read, who knows.

>>8368329
What then?

>>8368316
anyone who unnironicly calls himself an intelectual, is no intelectual.

Who's your favorite hungarian author?

Who is the best, in terms of rhetoric?

You're all cocksuckers. Go read Hogg (1995). Get a boner or get wet. Realise you did that while reading childporn. Understand the authors point. You are all fucking creeps. PS: Never judge books, like you never juedge people. PPS: fuck all y'all.

>>8368557
Antal Szerb.

>>8368488
I know myself too well to know that I am an intellectual.

>>8368488
>>8368604
really makes you think

>>8368316
Looking for a book to read. That being said: What is the best book that you have ever read that will make me cum buckets?

TAZ much? do you think Peter Lamborn Wilson is a pedo for what he wrote about NAMBLA?

>>8368316
Do you ever think about reading Finnegans Wake just for shits?

>>8368316
what would be the best order of books/philosophers to get into modern philosophy

>>8368316
Favorite book?

>>8368318
A stone.

File: donkey.jpg (13KB, 400x214px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 400x214px

>>8368316
Authors similar to Dostoevsky or Knut (Hunger)? Girlfriend likes their psychology, analysis of human nature (she is a psychology graduate).

>>8368316
> read nearly

Why didn't you read everything? Plebs nowdays, they want to get praised for a work in progress. Literally a Patrician 0.4v

Why couldnt Grand write his book and his letter until after the plague?

File: tmp_26725-image-0e244727afe967bd4d0ed6afcaff7a4a703b548482f3f0aa7e647adabdee6451-V-1567728136.jpg (229KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 960x1280px

>>8368316
Should I start with the Greeks? How old are you and how long have you spent cramming all these literature works?

>>8368318
Not OP. My answer is a Wocket.