[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Philosophy and Disorientation

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 90
Thread images: 17

File: waterboard.jpg (93KB, 482x480px) Image search: [Google]
waterboard.jpg
93KB, 482x480px
Delving into modern philosophy has left me fairly disoriented and depressed, and I've realized the effect it's had on me on the past year or so. I am very indecisive in what I do, and I feel very weak and confused. I have stopped reading as much as I used to, and I continuously feel I have to re-evaluate my life goals.

I am tempted to make a pragmatic decision and attempt to delude myself into accepting axioms that will lead me to work hard, simply by not thinking about those axioms, like a kind of pseudo-mysticism/pseudo-religion. Is this an ok idea? I'm thinking, like Bokononism from Cat's Cradle, maybe humans need illusion to supplement the irrationality of the world
>>
>>8348997
Its sounds like you caught a case of growingupism. The best thing to do is to keep posting here and drastically reduce social contact, you don't want to be influenced by outsiders
>>
>>8348997
This happened to me.

I solved this by getting a job.
>>
>>8349012
>>8349012

I don't understand, what do you mean? Growingupism? I sense sarcasm in the second sentence, haha

>>8349014

I actually have the privilege of interning somewhere this summer, but the 8 hour grind ends up intensifying these feelings ironically
>>
>>8348997
Have you considered just taking the redpill?

It seriously helped me find meaning and truth
>>
>>8349044
>interning
This might be part of your problem. I interned a year before at an office and it didn't help at all. The job I got later on consisted only of cleaning shit. It was a simple job consisting of a basic physical task which needed to be completed. It helped me regain my footing.
>>
I think Nietzsche said that any belief is better than none. Nowadays it is politics which attracts the nihilist that is repulsed by said nihilism. Is it correct? I don't know
>>
>>8348997
Just find what you like and what makes you happy and latch onto it. There are two rational responses to the realisation that life might be meaningless - find what previously gave it value to you and cling onto it, or do what you suggested and invent some larger concept, then don't think about what that concept draws into that is larger than it.


I suggest the former as the latter I find it hard to truly believe and ingrain within oneself.
>>
>>8348997
Same.
>>
>>8348997
have you read notes from the underground?
>>
>>8349064
>>8349064

What do you mean? I believe I have taken it before, but it causes me to want to fade into existence and stop living

>>8349076

Hmmm... this is interesting, maybe down the line I'll see what happens

>>8349097

Sounds like something Nietzsche would push, do you happen to know which book that idea is from? Genuinely curious, I only read Twilight of the Idols and part of TSZ

>>8349102

To be honest, religion used to give me value, I connected it with mathematics and the overall concept of a higher truth, of Platonic forms and such, everything else I simply realize is transient and I don't feel much ultimately from, unless it distracts me... thanks for this, have you passed through something similar?
>>
>>8349126

No, I haven't
>>
>>8349128
Religion has been one of the two most common central values throughout history, alongside dedication to the state. I agree with Russell when he says that philosophy has, post-Descartes, been a struggle to regain human purpose and a rejection of purpose and historical value has left many people feeling alienated from themselves (funnily enough he says that the study of philosophy is in his eyes the best means of achieving a knowledge of that purpose).


Personally I have not, bizarrely, managed to internalise the lack of absolutes we face and have had the fortune to not experience discombobulation and depression as a result, but many friends have.


Might be worth giving Kierkegaard a read, I think his work would really help you out
>>
>>8348997
>I continuously feel I have to re-evaluate my life goals.
>I am tempted to make a pragmatic decision and attempt to delude myself into accepting axioms that will lead me to
1. You're a quitter 2. You're a pseud.

You were never interested in philosophy or you wouldn't shit out platitudes like

>maybe humans need illusion to supplement the irrationality of the world

I mean listen to yourself and get some self awareness here lmao

>like a kind of pseudo-mysticism/pseudo-religion.

Translation: I'm a big fat pseud kiddy cunt

You are not a "knower" because you "delved into """modern philosophy"""" you twat. If you wanted you could forget all about your little "philosophical journey" in two minutes.

Your weakness is YOUR fault and by you I mean you as a kiddy cunt in search of identity not the "le tormented knower" you think you are.

And you know what, that's ok because you're a kid and so am I.

Just try starting with the Greeks next time
>>
>>8349173

Sure, I looked at Works of Love, but only briefly. Fear and Trembling is mainly on theology, yes? Is there any work of his you recommend? Not trying to be spoonfed, but recommendations are always nice

>>8349222

I re-read this a few times, but I don't understand. I think I see what you're trying to say, but can you directly attack my ideas maybe? It sounds like you're just kind of throwing your hands in the air and saying, screw your ideas simply because I claim so. I never claim I am a "knower", my dilemma is that I lack it

Arguably my weakness is my fault, for thinking so much. What are you trying to say? I genuinely want to know, but it honestly sounds less like criticism and more like noise, haha
>>
>>8349249

Bro, this is baby's first existencial crisis what you are going through. Just start with the Greeks like the other anon said. Your view of things is still really immature.
>>
Or you could just accept Christ
>>
>>8349269

Trust me, it's not the first haha. I have looked at Plato, but Nietzsche just kind of destroys his idealism in "The Problem of Socrates". I assume you are pointing me towards Stoicism? And what about my views are immature... please tell me, I need to know. Do you think post-modernism is immature as well? I see your claim and know what you're saying, but I don't understand why. If you know something I don't, destroy me

>>8349280

Too difficult after reading through the Bible, and then histories of the scriptures... and scientific discoveries only add to the diminishing certainty
>>
File: 1452195695849.jpg (1MB, 2048x1366px) Image search: [Google]
1452195695849.jpg
1MB, 2048x1366px
>>8348997
At this point I feel like this picture should be a sticky because someone ends up posting an existential crises thread nearly daily.
>>
>>8349249
Fear and Trembling is just what you're looking for, trust me. The Sickness Unto Death will be great for you too
>>
File: 1468479977001.jpg (172KB, 520x853px) Image search: [Google]
1468479977001.jpg
172KB, 520x853px
>>8349287
>Trust me, it's not the first haha. I have looked at Plato, but Nietzsche just kind of destroys his idealism in "The Problem of Socrates".
>>
File: 89HANHg.gif (693KB, 339x279px) Image search: [Google]
89HANHg.gif
693KB, 339x279px
>>8349287
>Trust me, it's not the first haha. I have looked at Plato, but Nietzsche just kind of destroys his idealism in "The Problem of Socrates". I assume you are pointing me towards Stoicism?
JUST
>>
>>8348997
Discordianism is what you're talking about. there is no such thing as living in a world devoid of myth. right now, you're buying into a "myth" without even realizing it, thinking it's true.

Discordianism is similar to Bokononism, in that theyre both pseudo-religions that can be used as real religions. Overall, I'd say be a discordian, as well as create your own narrative. Produce your own myths. Take your view of the world into your own hands
>>
>>8349287
>philosopher X destroyed philosopher Y
>are saying that philosophy Z is the right one?

This fucking guy. I hope you're joking at our expense.
https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2016/07/21/the-poverty-of-philosophy-textbooks/
>>
>>8349291

Thank you, genuinely

>>8349293

It's part of Twilight of the Idols: http://www.handprint.com/SC/NIE/GotDamer.html#sect2

And, under Skirmishes of an Untimely Man: "lato goes further. He says with an innocence possible only for a Greek, not a "Christian," that there would be no Platonic philosophy at all if there were not such beautiful youths in Athens: it is only their sight that transposes the philosopher's soul into an erotic trance, leaving it no peace until it lowers the seed of all exalted things into such beautiful soil. Another queer saint! One does not trust one's ears, even if one should trust Plato. At least one guesses that they philosophized differently in Athens, especially in public. Nothing is less Greek than the conceptual web-spinning of a hermit — amor intellectualis dei [intellectual love of God] after the fashion of Spinoza. Philosophy after the fashion of Plato might rather be defined as an erotic contest, as a further development and turning inward of the ancient agonistic gymnastics and of its presuppositions. What ultimately grew out of this philosophic eroticism of Plato? A new art form of the Greek agon: dialectics. Finally, I recall — against Schopenhauer and in honor of Plato — that the whole higher culture and literature of classical France too grew on the soil of sexual interest. Everywhere in it one may look for the amatory, the senses, the sexual contest, "the woman" — one will never look in vain."

>>8349297

I am aware of other ideas, such as negative hedonism, but something tells me you are referring to something else

I am very ignorant and stupid, but at least tell me where my issues lie

>>8349303

Sounds a lot like Nietzsche's "Creator", but I haven't heard of the term, thanks for that

>>8349306

This is an interesting article
I think my choice of words was rash, I admit, I don't necessarily believe entire ideas are "destroyed" by criticisms... I only mean to say, that by pointing out that all knowledge comes from the senses, and suggesting rationality was only utilized as a defense by Plato as someone unable to enjoy life, it invalidates the Western idea of "Platonic forms" which is perpetuated in different shapes

pic unrelated

I believe this thread has deviated a little from my original question, which is if my idea above is ok
>>
>>8349350
As I see , you are putting the cart before the horse. Stop reading Nietzsche and reading Plato through Nietzsche. Plus you're using the wrong framework to approach Philosophy, which is mainly empirical (x invalidates y) and not as a necessary development of ideas.
>>
File: 1464737065656[1].jpg (304KB, 1012x1456px) Image search: [Google]
1464737065656[1].jpg
304KB, 1012x1456px
>>8349350
>Nietzsche
>Nietzsche
>Nietzsche
GREEKS
GREEKS
GREEKS
>>
>>8349128
>What do you mean? I believe I have taken it before, but it causes me to want to fade into existence and stop living

are you talking about DXM?
>>
>>8349370

Ok... out of curiosity, are there any good books on the "right way" to approach Philosophy? The article is useful, but it's always nice to know if there is more source on this

Also, if it isn't too much, do you see a critical issue with my thought process so far, that you can identify? Is it simply too much to explain without me having to backtrack? I will regardless, but still... in the Symposium, when Plato approaches Diotima with his faulty concept on Eros, she rebuts and reveals his ignorance. I don't think it is unreasonable for me to ask for the same?

>>8349389

Haha, thanks for the image. It is not like I have not read Descartes, Hume, Leibniz, Spinoza (although I admit I still lack a great depth of understanding), but I will look at the Greeks at some point

>>8349409

Is DXM the redpill?
>>
File: DXM_Doses.jpg (88KB, 910x768px) Image search: [Google]
DXM_Doses.jpg
88KB, 910x768px
>>8349416

yes
>>
>>8349370
>>8349416

As an afterthought, I realize you are talking about the development of arguments for concepts, no idea should simply be "thrown away," which is what you fear I am suggesting? i.e., Platonic forms are not wrong, there are more arguments that can be pursued in defense?
>>
>>8349420

Oh, no, I thought you were referring to the traditional idea of the red pill, like from the Matrix

I haven't
>>
>>8349287

You seem immature because your views are almost always one sided and definite. Like saying Nietzsche "destroyed" Plato and then quoting a passage of him trolling like only he could and reducing it all to sexuality years before Freud.

And then you seem to dismiss other ideas without a second tought, like someone who watched a couple videos on youtube on the matter and decided it just wasn't for you, like
>I am aware of other ideas, such as negative hedonism
(which btw don't take the word of Nietzsche on those "ideas", he was a dumbass when it comes to that part)

I think you have closed your mind off with what you think is a solid logic, but it has some deep flaws within it. You seem lack wisdom, is how I'd put it. Finding the Truth, with capital T, is not always the right objective. Sometimes, you have to find your own truth.
>>
Dear OP

Read the Ego and His Own. It probably won't help your situation. In fact it will probably exacerbate it. But it'll make for a nice meme and will probably teach you a thing or two about yourself.

Yours Truly,
Anonymous
>>
File: 1463362809131.jpg (121KB, 1600x1102px) Image search: [Google]
1463362809131.jpg
121KB, 1600x1102px
>>8348997

the world is not irrational now what
>>
>>8349416
>Ok... out of curiosity, are there any good books on the "right way" to approach Philosophy

Read Plato's Apology
>>
>>8349445

That makes sense, thanks for that. I suppose it's mainly because I feel depressed for not seeing the Truth, with a capital T, it feels like the only way, but I suppose it's just a feeling ultimately...

>>8349472

Did I really miss so much substance from the Apology? Will do

I think I will ultimately pursue my stupid "religion", because I think it'll grant me the sanity to move forward - at least until I become wiser
>>
>>8349484
Oi! You didn't reply to my recommendation of The Ego! What the frick?
>>
File: image.jpg (1MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
1MB, 2448x3264px
>ITT Heidegger, not even once


Uh... philosophy is over dudes
>>
>>8349502
Don't listen to this guy OP he is being mean, avoid Stirner until you are more together
>>
>>8349503
>Uh... philosophy is over dudes
And it ended with Stirner.
>>
>>8349424
From the same blog (I'm not getting paid to advertise him I swear, those are just very good and succinct posts about the subject):
https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/meillassoux-i-primary-qualities-and-correlationism/

plus:
https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/reflections-on-philosophical-methodology/
>>
File: fugging_sboogs.png (52KB, 700x419px) Image search: [Google]
fugging_sboogs.png
52KB, 700x419px
>>8349509
>>
>>8349510
Not that I disagree with you, but I do disagree with your disagreeing agreeing
>>
>>8349448
>>8349502

Sorry, I am grateful for the recommendation. I've felt like Stirner is more something I should look at when I've read more

>>8349511

Very grateful for more of links on these ideas! Thanks again, will save
>>
WHEN YOU THINK WE'RE LOST WE'RE EXPLORING
YOU DON'T WANT THE TRUTH, TRUTH IS BORING
>>
>>8349517
And I disagree with your disagreeing and agree with your refraining from disagreeing with me agreeing.

>>8349524
Well, have you read any Hegel at all? If yes, and you understood it fairly well, read Stirner. Otherwise don't.
>>
>>8349445
>Finding the Truth, with capital T, is not always the right objective. Sometimes, you have to find your own truth.

This sounds like a useless platitude, to be quite honest family. Care to explain what you mean exactly?
>>
>>8349531

Not that anon, but the Truth is ephemeral and unknowable; all one person can know is their perception of the truth and in so doing find their own truths.
>>
This is just the result of recognizing your own ignorance, and the first step on the road to self-actualization. You've always been lost, but becoming cognizant of it leads to nihilism and confusion. Fail to continue the path of self-actualization and you'll fall into utter apathy and nihilism, resulting either in being an absolute loser with a superiority complex, or suicide. But continue to discover and get yourself ground to put your feet upon and you'll be on the righteous path.
>>
>>8349561
>resulting either in being an absolute loser with a superiority complex

it's scary that i actually know people like this, are you a psychologist
>>
>>8349541
>the Truth is ephemeral and unknowable
r u sure
>>
>>8349574

Is anyone?
>>
>>8349585
So no one truly knows whether the Truth is unknowable? I suppose if anyone knew that "the Truth is unknowable" is a true statement they'd be contradicting themselves :^)
>>
>>8349569
No, but I brushed with it myself and only just saved myself from that path. But I also had a lot of friends that didn't make it out, and I watched them walk the path of self-destruction.
>>
>>8348997
> work hard, simply by not thinking about those axioms
>need illusion

Here's the quick answer: you're human, you will inevitably suffer from illusions. An obvious cop out answer is pic related, but really the ultimate answer is despite the illusions or realities anyone creates or believes in, they are still a part of that Universe. It brings me great comfort to proclaim this axiom: we were all one at one point in time.
>>
File: Eye-Benders-Shutterstock1.jpg (2MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
Eye-Benders-Shutterstock1.jpg
2MB, 1000x1000px
>>8349694
>>
Fuck everything OP, reject the red-pill and dedicate your life to art and self expression. Embrace the illusion.
>>
>>8349679

Define knowledge. If someone knew the Truth was unknowable it would be the same as someone 'knowing' God exists, or someone 'knowing' God does not exist.

In this case is knowledge truth or Truth? Does one's knowledge constitute immutable fact or is it unreliable?
>>
>>8349287
>Too difficult after reading through the Bible, and then histories of the scriptures
False, it should be infinitely easier after reading scripture; you only reject the concept because you're a dunce.
>and scientific discoveries only add to the diminishing certainty
Scientific discoveries are both irrelevant to the subject at hand and irrelevant in whole because they are presupposing.

The rest of your post is just as ignorant.
>>8349458
Even rationalism is irrational.
>>
>>8349574
Underrated post
>>
>>8349732
In that case I meant "knowledge" as Truth, that is, someone cannot objectively prove/know "all Truth is unprovable" because that would be a contradiction.

I was just kidding around, but my honest opinion is that I think some Truths are knowable, but the full picture has an unknown fraction of unprovable/unknowable parts.

Cogito ergo sum is True, isn't it?
>>
>>8349833

That's the way I see it; there is one objective Truth that is unknowable to humanity. We can assemble some part of that Truth through our collective empirical and rational findings but can never know the Truth in its untarnished and perfect form.

Is "cogito ergo sum" true, though? Most would argue that it is; in this world often the only thing we can know for sure is that we have the capacity for thought.

But if everyone is running around stating that they exist on the basis that they can 'prove' it by the virtue of their own capabilities of thought, then doesn't that devalue the proof? Am I real simply because I believe that I can think, or am I just a conduit for some other entity?
>>
>>8349833
>Cogito ergo sum is True, isn't it?
No
>>
>>8349882
I guess where we differ slightly is that I would define those pieces as "Truth" as well.

>Am I real simply because I believe that I can think, or am I just a conduit for some other entity?
Okay, let's interpret it a little differently to make it more conservative and easier to say it's True: I would say I definitely exist in some way, regardless of whether I'm actually simulation, etc. I'm definitely a real "something", existing "somewhere" real, and experiencing it with some sort of questionably accurate perception. You might say it doesn't mean much, but my point is that I think there is at least some knowable Truth.
>>
>>8349882
>>8349833
It comes down to representation, or rather the inadequacy of language. Remember with "true" comes "false." The standard model of true and false is if a statement made matches reality. i.e. how accurate the representation/model used matches with reality.
The "truth" you are searching for is raw existence or phenomenon. It is the thing itself, there's no need for representation and so there is no true or false. The "truth" will not be found in any language, in any books, or in any model. We may never fully be able to describe truth but we can make use of it. All living organisms make use of "truth." From the viruses, to bacteria, to starfish, and so on. It is raw engineering. Shit either works or it doesn't.
>>
This same fucking thread every day, maybe just worded a bit differently each time. Lurk more.
>>
File: Mandel_zoom_00_mandelbrot_set.jpg (1MB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]
Mandel_zoom_00_mandelbrot_set.jpg
1MB, 2560x1920px
>>8350035
Well said. There is certainly underlying Truth that is being sampled by all forms of life (or any object for that matter), whether or not they can describe it or even be consciously aware of it, etc. It's encouraging because as you say, we can still make use of it.

>The "truth" will not be found in any language, in any books, or in any model.
I think I disagree with this though, there's some spooky stuff in mathematics which seems separate from reality that I would call Truth (in a self-contained kind of way).

>inb4 muh ideal forms
>>
>>8349290
this
>>
File: 1466881153951.png (104KB, 667x670px) Image search: [Google]
1466881153951.png
104KB, 667x670px
>>8350278
mathematics deal with truth values, which has nothing do with truth, not truth.
>>
>>8350278
dude, what are you saying?
>>
File: plebs_like_mazes.jpg (57KB, 712x564px) Image search: [Google]
plebs_like_mazes.jpg
57KB, 712x564px
>>
>>8350278
That's certainly over my head. You must be one of those geniuses I keep hearing about tv. You even posted a math bubble thingy.
>>
>>8348997
Embrace the chaos. Eventually one of your life options will show itself to yield the most possibilities or be the best balance of effort to benefit or at least be the thing you're most suited for. No need to consciously choose your delusions.
>>
>>8350278
Existence doesn't necessarily have to have any real continuity. It's just being viewed from within that prism. Mathematics is a self-contained system of symbols and it's possible that the only constant in the universe is change.
>>
The only antidote to the pain of existence is mysticism. To lose the self, even for a moment, is to lose suffering. To achieve union with God, or the All, or whatever you choose to believe constitutes the nature of existence, is the greatest pleasure you can experience. Don't bother with religious nonsense if you don't need to, but use mystical methods how you want to.
>>
>>8348997
Wasn't your initial curiosity sparked by a desire to find a new orientation? Do you really want to go back to the comfy thoughtlessness you once knew?

Learning takes time and comes at the cost of something else that its taken time replaces, which might be perceived as painful or insubstantial, but endure and you will find your truths.

You could also switch to a different topic in philosophy, and remember to apply philosophy to your life. Philosophy is evaluation but it it also application and the intertwining of the two.
>>
>>8350682
>>8350693
Sorry, I'm sleep deprived and retarded, read the post I was replying to for more context. They were saying all truth is tied to physical reality, but I think there is at least some "truth" to be found in abstract stuff (like math) as well. I was being purposely hand wavy about math in general because I don't think I understand it enough to explain more completely.

The picture just an example of a pretty much completely abstract mathematical structure. It's generated from a very simple, iterated operation, but produces a complicated fractal as a result. We can only probe at its shape with raw computation. But even if we're too stupid to understand it or our computers are too physically limited to fully probe it, isn't that structure always there? Isn't that a kind of truth? Maybe, I don't know.
>>
Philosophy is a matter of time, patience. It is beyond all absolutes, beyond good and evil.
-deividas

Ascetic.House.
>>
I asked these questions in public and was arrested for days. lmao
#5thofnovember
>>
>>8350807
>Mathematics is a self-contained system of symbols
That doesn't counter anything I said? What are you trying to say?
>>
>>8350828
That the "truth" revealed by math only applies to math, and potentially doesn't mean anything about the truer nature of the universe because it itself was conceived within this prism of potentiality and would be subject to whatever inherent limits in comprehension.
>>
There isn't a right or wrong, is there.?
I feel strangly damp. I don't know where to go, i just know where i don't want to go.
Are my feelings validated, or are they falsified?
Is philosophy the right path? I know nothing. There is nothing. Thanks guys.
>>
File: 1469386580991.jpg (182KB, 1065x1600px) Image search: [Google]
1469386580991.jpg
182KB, 1065x1600px
>>8350035
>It comes down to representation, or rather the inadequacy of language. Remember with "true" comes "false." The standard model of true and false is if a statement made matches reality. i.e. how accurate the representation/model used matches with reality.
>The "truth" you are searching for is raw existence or phenomenon. It is the thing itself, there's no need for representation and so there is no true or false. The "truth" will not be found in any language, in any books, or in any model. We may never fully be able to describe truth but we can make use of it. All living organisms make use of "truth." From the viruses, to bacteria, to starfish, and so on. It is raw engineering. Shit either works or it doesn't.
>>
>>8350850
All truths be untrue
>>
>>8350906
Truth is complex>>8349585

Ther is no "intrinsic" truth. Merely truths, we are living in the desert of the real answer follow falsified rules meant for the aristocrats. Cultural relativism explains this phenomenon. We are only special insofar that we think we are such. Existential nihilism posits the greatest questions man has yet to grapple. The successors of this method are sociologists and deconstructionists. Read Baudrillard, Heidegger, or even Sartre if humanism interests you. Otherwise, read Plato's Gorgias, or Nietzsche's Antichrist.
>>
>>8349574
You are wrong lol. The absolute which your statements positive known as
>>
>>8352229 solipsism*
>>
>>8352224
Thanks, i was only rambling there, i am going to read them anyway. It was one of the downphases i have from time to time.
>>
>>8352308
Feel free to ramble, I'm a minor in philosophy
Thread posts: 90
Thread images: 17


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.