Trying to understand my wordy friend

Your "friend" is just bombarding you with out of context nonsense.

This entire paragraph makes little to no sense.

>>8342125
you both sound like gay nerds

File: 11219453_916080155132361_5754952014645793122_o.jpg (84KB, 1920x971px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1920x971px

>>8342132
shes always like this, every time she speaks or types lol. Another example...she posted this as a "caption" to her coverphoto

"The role of the pacifist is to not feel anger if someone accuses you of a bad act or a sin of which you actually did not commit. Because you know that you didn't do it, your consciousness is clear and indignation if futile communication with the poor in mind. It seems that now is the objective time of the witches in mysticism revival unfortunately, so that I can relate to a stereotyped victim that while I rode my bike, screamed at me, "I am not a gangster." And so I think their their is an omniscient perhaps spell of the victims in mass value even that has value for social redemption. Perhaps this social redemption is of the kind where, because I know that when entering into discourse, one may face a neurosis that dispossesses, delusions, and turns one's head into a weak cat head, then I know that I can also get my IQ amplified from glory of the moral saint. If I know that my teacher showed us how marijuana in evil for brain development, and I consciously did not drink or smoke marijuana for all of my high school term, nor did I have straight sex in high school, then I also know that because someone who had visual prejudice against my style when I was at the beginning of college, can redeem my IQ to higher it momentarily in performance, because my philosophy classes are more rigorous than his fashion courses, and so he thought I smoked marijuana, which I let go as untrue at the time. But now that I can juxtapose my friend, a female who did smoke marijuana in her high school term, who told me that it made her memory messed up, I can congratulate myself for my good deed of taking care of my brain, so that belief in the brain performance is higher in value than conduct now, which will stay moderate of course, even if this means that the person who stereotyped me was tricked by me is used be me as a mnemonic device."

>>8342125
Your friend is pretentious.

>>8342125
What country are you from?

That whole response, except maybe the first question, has nothing to do with what you said.
Tell her you're not as smart as her and ask her to explain what she means in plain English. If she can't you know she is a pseud, and is probably spouting something she read out of context or something like that. At this point you can keep it to yourself and know to take what she says with a grain of salt, or you can call her out on it (depends how good of friends you are and how smart you are).
If she does explain it in plain English, maybe she's smarter than you and I and it just went over our heads the first time.

File: ch130214.gif (90KB, 900x287px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 900x287px

Your friend is taking a weak argument and attempting to make it seem strong by obscuring the meaning.

Let's see...

>>8342125
What your friend is saying is what I was thinking at about age 8 while watching cartoons: "Why does everything on these shows have an outline? My house doesn't have an outline, and neither do I!" The whole "glimmering in the eye" bit is saying that while nothing has a naturally occurring outline, we do see things in such a way that DRAWING an outline to show a discrete border is more convenient than the alternative. However, as "an American thinker" (I could not come up with a more pretentious self-description if I tried) she thinks that the way art has been produced since the stone age is silly and should be avoided. This whole thing could be reduced to half the length for more clarity.


>>8342140
This whole "paragraph" is grammatically incorrect and covers... three unrelated topics, by my count, and segways into a fourth. Ah... Don't get mad if you're falsely accused, people believe that magic is real and so do I, and I used to think that marijuana was bad for the brain so I avoided it, and it turns out I was right.

Your friend has a high opinion of herself, but needs to learn some humility.

>>8344488
This is why i asked where they are from. If she does not really speak English, thats what thoughts badly written down look like.
All and all intelligent people should be able to say things more understandable.

Here's her review of Batman vs Superman

>Affleck's remark, "I'm real when it's useful," at first sight adheres to the postmodern solipsistic and relativistic modes. This is confirmed by Terrio when questioned about his research for Justice League, which included "red- and blueshifts in physics". However, on further inspection, Affleck's comment simultaneously reinspects Husserl's and Wittgenstein's "form of life". This invariably leads to a more pragmatic worldview, as Pierce declares "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
>Affleck further confirms the pragmatic totality when approaching Miller and Momoa:
>"So you're fast."
>"You can talk to fish."
>Reality as it operates in Snyder films, isn't subservient to language, they work in tandem. This leads as back to Eastern philosophy, the Hinduist Guru Mantra becomes another mythopoetical jigsaw piece in the totality of Justice League. As Brody succintly observed, "Even at his most pedestrian or bombastic, Snyder makes a far more engaging film than Christopher Nolan (an executive producer of “Batman v Superman”) ever did—because Nolan presumes to know and to show, whereas Snyder wants to see. Even his slender philosophical world seems like he’s discovering it, not delivering it."

>>8344720
what the fuck

>>8344720
Ok, thats it. She has something wrong with her brain.

>>8344720
>>8342140
>>8342125

Prove to me that this isn't just you making this up

File: 1362562673210.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

drugs

>>8344720
The first /lit/ thread I've looked at in years, and this is what I see. This reminds me of why i aborted and took on mathematics instead. Undoubtedly, there are beautiful, cogent ideas to be found in the humanities but they are rare and rarely coherent. Conjectures... conjectures everywhere, and people all to happy to obfuscate.

Your friend's writing is confused and she should really put the pen down - she isn't as clever as she thinks.

Maybe I'll come back in another few years...

>>8342125

Literally sounds like a stroke.

>>8344665
>What your friend is saying is what I was thinking at about age 8 while watching cartoons: "Why does everything on these shows have an outline? My house doesn't have an outline, and neither do I!"

Damn I haven't thought of that since I thought of that at age 8 as well.

>>8344754
she has nice feet tho

>>8342125
she's saying don't think in lines, think in shades. it's pretty simple I think

>>8342140
loolll

>>8344720
Not as good as this one desu.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=bcF48z6TVf4

File: 5149146-5336641901-132.g.gif (16KB, 391x278px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 391x278px

>>8344812

I majored in English until I realized that there was nobody in my university's English department with whom I wanted to be associated.

She's either schizophrenic or satirical.

>>8342140
Is your friend a schizophrene? This is gibberish and full of spelling and grammar mistakes.

>>8344850
Pics?

File: bizarre-Japanese-Delicacies-1.jpg (26KB, 570x369px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 570x369px

>>8342140
>I know that when entering into discourse, one may face a neurosis that dispossesses, delusions, and turns one's head into a weak cat head

>>8342140
>nor did I have straight sex in high school,

so she's a virgin right? i can make her my waifu?

>>8344812
>all to happy
Maybe you aborted and took on mathematics because you fucking suck, bro

OP here lol, back. Uh I didn't write this >>8344720

>>8344931
>>8345080
She mentions schizophrenia in one her statuses I'll post it in a sec

>>8345441
Right? Lol I don't even know where to begin there. Oh and yeah speaks this way as well, absolutely no difference, except the spelling errors ofc.

Heres the status she made om schiz. "If schizophrenia is higher in the female demographic and the mental illness is made through intentional rationalization and the opposite general normative, then subjective philosophy can criticize identity politics who appeal to human condition as somehow referential, when in fact is is more like completely exceptional types with no relating experiences.."

>>8342125
There is such a thing has human nature in the same way that there is a "dog nature" or "ant nature." There's more in there than just anatomy, but it sounds like your friend is kind of new age-y.

>>8345586
>I didn't write this >>8344720 #
That makes sense because that one was much more readable.

>>8344665
>segways

>>8344720
>Affleck's remark, "I'm real when it's useful," at first sight

How do you see a remark?

This is like Eye of Argon bad