Redpill me on subvocalizing, /lit/. Is it just a meme trick for

>>8330855
Meme

It's something that new readers do, but that has to be lost if they're to read any faster.

it's real.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24KnwTepKdU

t. tai lopez

>>8330855
I do it and I can't stop.

>>8330892
This is the dumbest advice ever

>>8330919
it's for self-help books

>>8330892
That's some outdated editing.

>muh pills

Take your meds

>>8330855
how funny is that illustration

If I'm reading epic poetry why would I not want to sub vocalize? Surely not doing so is also detrimental to the power of the prose?

>>8330855
It's a meme. Everything I have read on it says you'll lose a lot of reading comprehension, it's a lot like skimming in that sense.

>>8330855
kek

Wait, what exactly is subvocalization? I always thought that it was just when you hear your own voice in your head while reading something.

>>8333351
That is subvocalization. The meme is that it's possible to not do it, which has been proven false by countless experiments.

>>8331445
If you're reading poetry you should be vocalizing, never mind the sub.

>>8330892
So this is how Sebastian does it.

Sub-vocalization is like manual breathing for me. I never do it unless someone reminds me that it's a thing and then I do it for like 20 minutes until it goes away naturally.

>>8330855
I read every sentence out aloud because I haven't spoken to another human being since they invented self-checkouts.