Has Nietzsche ever been debunked?

Ya, by a horse

yes, look in the mirror and close one eye.

>>8327578
/thread

>>8327578
It's a myth anon...

My diary desu

What do you mean "debunked"?

>>8327574
He didn't write anything intelligible enough to debunk. A great method, by the way, you should try using it.

>>8327574
His philosophy is as debunkable as Heraclitus. What can be done is it can be superseded, but not debunked.

Pretty sure any religion would debunk him.

>>8327574

Not at all, my man

I've only had passing engagement, but I'm persuaded that Nietzsche debunked Nietzsche.

I'm specifically thinking of his argument about the ascetic ideal in Genealogy of Morals. It seems he proves that everyone must be wrong, including himself. Essay 3, passages 23-28. Is anyone familiar with this section? Am I missing something?

I'm pretty sure a lot of people have criticized his genealogical explanation for modern morality.

But he was right on so many individuals things in general, which is the reason he was so influential, such as the fact that knowledge simply isn't power per se, but that it is structured around systems of power, like judicial courts, religious institutions and educational institutions, which is hard to disagree with.

>>8327574
Call us when you take off the training wheels and get to Schopenhauer

>>8329035
>Nietzsche debunked Nietzsche
Paradox and contradiction are seen in his work only by people who are failing to see the other side of the story, the big picture of his perspective if you will.

>>8327754
"lul cuz god said so" is not a valid philosophical argument.

Nietzsche madness was brought about by his compulsive masturbation