Is this book any good? Seems interesting to me.

>>8325719
Tbh I find Jung himself to be tedious and perambulating and preferred secondary analysis of his work to the primary stuff since the interesting ideas are preserved and refined, though detractors of my viewpoint will no doubt use the words 'oversimplified' instead

>>8325719
I liked it.

It's more interesting if you want a peek at Jung's first person mystical experience, rather than being interested specifically in his contributions to psychology

File: what (2).png (208KB, 927x741px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 927x741px

Not OP, but is there a guide out there for reading Jung? Or could someone gimme the lowdown?

>>8325757
No one actually reads Jung.

Just read Memories, Dreams, Reflections.