Does it ever rise to the sheer lunacy of Gravity's Rainbow, even remotely? I'm like 250 pages in and there has been some horny nine year olds and a singing dog, but nothing that has risen near the heights of Gravity's Rainbow.
I know it's supposed to be a more intimate and tame story, but the loony boner rockets and sentient bulbs were my favorite aspects of GR.
>>8318663
There's some zany stuff as you've noticed, but no, it never reaches the highs or lows of GR. It's a good book, but you got memed if you were expecting it to be as good or better than GR.
>>8318705
its way better than GR
Inherent Vice is better than GR
>>8318663
>but the loony boner rockets and sentient bulbs were my favorite aspects of GR.
If that's what you mean by lunacy then M&D is still going to deliver
It's better than GR either way, ignore contrarian faggots
>>8319310
Pretty sure saying it's better than GR is contrarian, bucko.
>>8319160
>Inherent Vice is better than GR
how can someone who has actually read both books even come close to think this? Your contrarianism is going too far
>>8319160
wew