So i was never into books because when i was a teen whenever

File: 2016-01-02 18.46.33.jpg (90KB, 480x650px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 480x650px

>>8304573
Shit i forgot to say pretty please in the op,

Pretty please /lit/ fuckers

>>8304573
>when i was a teen whenever i asked people about cool books they would always tell me about harry potter and novels and lightweight stuff

omg stupid inauthentic pleb normies REEEE, amirite?? :)


Start with Gombrich's The Story of Art

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6475ZpbH_cGSWxsZjdtY05ySGM/view?usp=sharing

>>8304588
Its not like that, honestly that kind of stuff never got me, im pretty bad at reading, as in sitting down and flipping through pages, and fucking HK Rowling never did it easier for me

>whenever i asked people about cool books they would always tell me about harry potter and novels and lightweight stuff

same thing for pretty much all of us. that's no excuse.

"""""Read""""" the big two-volume 'Art since 1900', and taschen's '100 Contemporary Artists'. 'The Story of Art' is a bit pop-y but will give you a good overview of what happened in art up to the present. Otherwise, just google shit movement by movement, or buy the book on amazon with the most convincing reviews.

>>8304602
Im already pretty solid on overall art history i wanted to know more about specific books signature in specific art movements? I dont know if that even make sense