Where to start with Hannah Arendt?

The introduction and first chapters of Between Past and Future.

>>8174248
>reading female """""""""philosophers""""""""""

You are an intellectual insect

>>8174248
The Human Condition.

You don't because she was a stupid dike.

>>8174469
maybe bi, definitely not a dyke.

>>8174248

She's jewish I'd be careful if I was you.

>>8174280
I agree whole-heartedly with this post, as I am a Schopenhauer scholar (I wrote my PhD thesis on his famous book "On Women") I know that the fairer sex is inherently inferior and incapable of the complexity of thought held solely by males. As is demonstrated in this post, men posses the innate ability to make stunning critiques of entire groups of people in mere sentence fragments. Women, on the other hand, require an entire cannon of feminist "theory" in order to make an oh-so-feeble attempt at proving their equality to men. Who would read a book (by a woman especially) when posts on /lit/ tell me everything I need to know?

>>8174248
human condition

>>8174749
>>8174248
This guy has the right idea. Arendt was mercurial and often self contradictory, but Human Condition is possibly the most cohesive summary of her political philosophy, and why it's important to start with the Greeks

>>8174280
>>8174469
>>8174505
>>8174472
lmfao

>>8174545
>I agree whole-heartedly with this post, as I am a Schopenhauer scholar

The Prodigal Son Brings Death

>>8174545

fucking kek