Virginia Woolf and DH Lawrence

>>8161970
Personally, I don't read women writers.

>>8161970
those are both great writers. what else is there to say about them? enjoy reading them. also read around the lives and times of the rest of the bloomsbury group. there's quite a lot of sex and drugs in there.

>>8161990
there's always one turd who has to make this comment in every fucking thread

I love woolf and I've recently started reading DH so they're great in my opinion

>>8162031
>>8162057
>femenists detected

>>8162062
you can't spell or form intelligent thought, I don't think you matter much in the scheme of things.

>>8161970
Hopefully you get to read some of D.H Lawrence's poetry, which is great and underappreciated.
I liked sons and lovers, Orlando and the waves which are the only novels by these authors I've read.

>>8162067
Here's thought for you:

Men built Western civilization. Men created all the great artworks. Men invented 99.99% of worthwhile inventions.

You were saying? Consider yourself BTFO

>>8162081
Virginia Woolf is part of the 0.01% then.

>>8162098
What did she invent?

>>8162081
>Western civilization

you say this like its a good thing

>>8162081
What does that have to do with Virginia Woolf and DH Lawrence?

>>8162081
And now you're destroying it, ironically. You're cucked on average so hard that all these arguments about creating great wonders of the civilisation are valueless now.

>forefathers build something great
>you're such a spineless pussy you shit on it all not to offend someone

Western men, everyone.

t. eastern man

>>8162062
no feminist would like DH Lawrence.
Anyway, I doubt you'll read Lady Chatterly, it's probably the least acclaimed of his 4 major works. And as other anons pointed out, his poetry is awesome!

>>8161970
>I've never read any of their works before
>/lit/, please tell me what to think
This thread is shit for so many reasons. Fuck all of you.

>>8161990
this guy is an idiot

>>8161970
virginia woolf is incredible.

>>8161970
reading woolf is great. her take on modernism is refreshing

>>8161970

...I'm sorry you got a retarded professor who didn't understand The Waves well enough to teach it.

>>8162723
How do you come to that conclusion?

>>8162896
Because you're not studying The Waves.

>>8162902
>The books we will cover haven't been distributed yet but I'm anticipating...

>>8162905

...I'm sorry you got a retarded poster who didn't understand your topic well enough to reply to it.

>>8162105
b8 or black

>>8162105
>>8163344
if black i guess that's true (from your perspective)

>>8162117
well, at least you're laying it all out there for us.

>>8162954
That's ok. I take it you've read the waves? What did you think of it?