Are these worth it? I want to know everything that there ever

>I want to know everything that there ever was, is and will be to know.

just read sam harris

>>8083706
Isn't he just about atheism?

File: 1462464509367.jpg (3KB, 160x160px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 160x160px

>>8083701
>stops at Napoleon

>>8083706
>suggesting a liberal, opportunistic kafir

If you want to know all that is, was, and will be, try

1. Das Kapital
2. Qur'an
3. The Phenomenology of Spirit
4. Finnegans Wake

>>8083701
just print out wikipedia and read it

>>8083762
Omer pls go

>>8083758
The author died

I know fun isn't strongly sought after on this board, but these are honestly the most enjoyable experience I've had reading history. They aren't anything great by modern scholarship standards, but they do provide a nice overview of each period. Rousseau and Revolution was my fave but that was mostly because it talks about how Louis XVI was a shitty king cause he wouldn't fuck his wife

>>8083770
>implying I'm an Arab when they're only 20% of the Muslim population.
>implying I'm a Muslim
>implying

>>8083784
>implying you're not Omer

>>8083762
I, Anthony O. Taylor, attest to this man's book recommendations as absolute pillars of knowledge and am confident that they will provide their reader with knowledge of all that was, is and will be.

Anthony Taylor

>>8083777
My only problem is reading that much history from a single source would be biased in alot of ways

>>8083762
/thread

>>8083762
Is this serious?

>>8083810
yeah, that's why I said read them for fun. I wouldn't rec the whole series, just pick a period you're interested in and go from there. If you seriously wanted to get an unbiased view of history, you'd be reading 90% primary sources

File: 1419798534056.jpg (105KB, 500x487px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 500x487px

>>8083853
>primary sources
>unbiased

oh dear

>>8083701
I read the first two and liked them. He has an engaging style.

>>8083810
At least there's no jewish revisionism