This thread again Which translation?

George

The one you posted (Andrew George). Many others are retellings more than translations.

>translation

Oxford comes with original text.

>>8051213
this one?

File: gilgamish.jpg (55KB, 329x499px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 329x499px

>>8051213
>>8051262

>>8051265
My bad, I was thinking of some other book. Oxford doesn't have original text but if I would still recommend Oxford's over Penguin's. Oxford is cheaper, has more pages, has higher standards, has a better cover, etc.

>>8051315
>Oxford doesn't have original text but if I would still recommend Oxford's over Penguin's. Oxford is cheaper, has more pages, has higher standards, has a better cover

do you read the book for having the original text or for it being cheaper, having more pages, higher standards of i dunno what (certainly not of having the original text) and having a better cover

>>8051315
Penguin>>Oxford in this case. George translation is standard, it uses all available sources and presents them next to each other, and more but I'm on phone and lazy.

fagles, fitzgarland, lattirmore, chapman, poe, except they said they poe was his own not really homers, but i would recommend fitzgarland even though i havent read him or any of them for that matter, just repeating what i heard down the great vine

>>8051188

http://www.amazon.com/Ancient-Near-East-Anthology-Pictures/dp/0691147264

You may as well pay the few extra dollars to get this edition, it contains an acclaimed translation of Gilgamesh and all the ANE literature you would need to read if you're not studying the period at a university level.

>>8052506
this bait?

File: 1458830146166.gif (2MB, 370x208px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 370x208px

>>8053512
200 clams for hardcover

>>8053533
>the great vine