Hi friends, /sci/ here. Anyone have a good starting reading list

Popper is a fag. Read Heisenberg's physics and philosophy. Or Thomas Kuhn.

>>7992920
>Popper is a fag.
pls expand

>>7992929
Quoted the wrong, you get the idea.

Just start anywhere. Once you pop the fun don't stop

>>7992929
Fgt, Kuhn is a response to Popper's positivism.

The classic is The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Also check out http://worthylab.tamu.edu/courses_files/popper_conjecturesandrefutations.pdf

I'd also read some Hempel, Carnap, Wesley Salmon, and maybe Kuhn, Lakatos, Quine, Goodman.
>goddamn mid 20th century philosophy of science so based

But it may be a better idea to just read http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/statistics/ and some of the linked articles.

Also worth considering, if you've got the time: working through one of
http://fitelson.org/290/syllabus.html
http://fitelson.org/confirmation/syllabus.html
there are also more syllabi on his website.

>>7993230
This. Great answer.