Paperback or hardcover?

File: red-flag-for-big-bags-02-af.jpg (29KB, 492x340px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 492x340px

>>7986637
Yeah, why not.

Now go read.

Paperback for short books, hardcover for long ones.

>tfw too poor for hardbacks

File: 1456209237834.jpg (6KB, 217x250px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 217x250px

>calling hardcovers hardbacks

>calling papercovers paperbacks

Hardcover, they last longer.

Paperbacks for books you take with you while travelling, then give to qts you meet on the road. Hardcover for ones you want to cherish and keep with you for a long time.

>>7986745

This, minus the part where I talk to qts

File: 1380948235346.gif (560KB, 300x203px) Image search: [Google]

560KB, 300x203px

>>7986711
>calling papercovers paper towns

>>7986689
I call them hardtops ironically tho

Hardcovers are more expensive and more of a pain in the ass to transport. The only purpose they serve is being aesthetically pleasing, which is directly in conflict with the importance that a book should serve to an individual,

File: download (74).jpg (12KB, 183x276px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 183x276px

>>7987082
>Calling Paper Magician paper tigers.