Which word do hack critics use the most? >numinous

>deeply felt

File: 1446607757668.jpg (37KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 600x450px

>the fact that
>so many books
>still name the Beatles
And so on.

>hack

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3fsSL4Bw9w

I’ve been perplexed and amused by fabricated notions about so-called “great books.” That, for instance, Mann’s asinine Death in Venice, or Pasternak’s melodramatic, vilely written Doctor Zhivago, or Faulkner’s corncobby chronicles can be considered masterpieces, or at least what journalists term “great books,” is to me the same sort of absurd delusion as when a hypnotized person makes love to a chair.

>>7887689
oh thank god i got in here early so i can write "limn"
that's the one!
thanks guys!
bye!

>>7888758

>Papa Vlad proving >translations are always shit

>>7887689

I am familiar with Rudolph Otto, who invented the word, and can't imagine a scenario where critics would find that word useful.

>booty