Is this a good book?
No.
>>7868663
/thread
Best prose I've read since Ulysses
>>7868661
For undergrads, sure.
>>7868676
I have never read this book and honestly want to know if you're being ironic
>>7868676
>undergrad detected
>>7868661
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4GOEgrsWoA
It's my absolute favorite. I think it's best described as a picaresque detective novel about the machinery of war and the psychology of subservience.
>>7868683
Do note, I am an undergrad, so he's probably right.
>>7868690
Im not but read the intro and see if it hooks you.
>>7868683
You're really going to say a book which is considered to be one of if not the best American novel past 1950 and absurdly complex great for undergrads?
>>7868763
>best American novel past 1950
Among college undergrads and on /lit/, sure.
For actually well-read people who know what they're talking about? Give me a break, kid.
>>7868864
>disagrees
>doesn't provided an alternative
We are all taking you very seriously, kid.
>>7868877
You'll know when you grow up a bit, undergrad sweetheart.
In the meantime, read more.
I'd recommend Mein Kampf to help you mature a bit and get a true perspective on the world
>>7868763
>best novels written after 1950
>not The Recognitions, JR, The Lime Twig, The Beetle Leg, Lost in the Funhouse, The Sot-Weed Factor, Women and Men, Omensetter's Luck, The Tunnel, Middle C, Mason & Dixon, Infinite Jest, The Pale King, or 2666
Yep, you're an undergrad.
>>7868902
i hope you are trolling with those examples
>>7868902
>posts a bunch of undergrad-core, especially DFuckingW
hope this is a joke
>>7868902
Bad bait. 2666 is by a Chilean author, you clown.
>>7868724
>that wordsworth crime and punishment on her shelf
>>7868891
You're really clever
>>7868891
shitty bait gets shittier
>>7868763
M&D is widely agreed to be better though