Thoughts on the Millennium Trilogy?

>>7805815
this is a literature board

>>7805817
Negroid

>>7805815
No, none.

File: EveryThingPopularIsWrong-Large-1.png (119KB, 1800x1350px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1800x1350px

It's popular and therefore shit.

>>7805815
undeniably horrible. the writing is a jumbled and garbled mess, and it's just boring as fuck. I put it down about a third of the way through the first book cause I wasn't going to waste my time on it

the author was a psychopathic communist

Swefag here, I wish our older literature got as much attention.

>>7805815
the film adaptation was ok

>>7806316

what's good classic swedish lit?

aside from strindberg

>>7806410
Hjalmar Söderberg is a good intro

Literally only notable because it features one original (for a thriller) character. All other characters bland or cliche as fuck, male protagonist is a clear author stand in. Plot standard fare.

Only read the first one, but I really enjoyed it. I hadn't seen the movie yet so I was able to keep an open, unbiased mind. The writing isn't anything amazing, but it certainly isn't horrible either. No idea why /lit/ hates it so much.

>>7806808
Honestly, I thought Lisbeth was one of the least interesting characters in the book. Never understood the fascination with her. In fact, she's probably the main reason I haven't bothered to pick up the second and third books.