one of these

File: template.jpg (116KB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 4160x2340px

template

File: 1454959717984.jpg (42KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x281px

The fuck did you have to make the template resolution so high, OP?

PLEBIAN: (Insert generally popular author)
CONTRARIAN: (Insert edgy /lit/ author)
PATRICIAN: (Insert someone from the canon/completely obscure)

>>7675747
Plebeian
>>7675801
Contrarian
>>7675865
Patrician

this is the worst thread of the day so far

>>7675744
>>7675747
>>7675801
Plebeian

>>7675865
>>7675891
Contrarian

>>7675886
Patrician

only a conformist would hate Bukowski

>>7675896
Plebeian

>>7675908
Contrarian

>>7675891
Patrician

>>7675744
you literally can't be a patrician without a beautiful and aesthetic face.

>>7676274
Moy kekkels, goy.

>>7675744
>>7675801
>>7676274
>>7676315
All correct.

>>7675744
Someone please identify these memesters.

>>7676567
Left is Bukowski
Right is Carver

I am ashamed to say that I do not recognise the middle guy.

>>7676672
Fante

>>7676315
what the fk is that piece of shit Rand doing in the comparison in the first place?

>>7676805
Eat shit Jung is awesome.

>>7676805

Lacan<Freud<Jung

>>7676843
/thread

What does that even mean

>>7676315
>Marx
>Partician
Wew

>>7676900
Kill yourself.

shit meme

is it supposed to be what i think or what others think?

"Here's someone I consider contrarian."

dumb

>>7676934
literally too stupid to understand simple memes

>>7676274
ay lmao

>>7675744
I'd rather read Bukowski over Carver and Fante any day. But I get your point.

>>7676905
;^)

>>7676315
This doesn't even make sense

>>7676831
>>7676843
Found the plebs

>>7676315
are you gay

>>7676805
Jung blew the shit out of Freud lel.

>>7677318
yeah i bet he did ;)

File: shakes iden..png (2MB, 1658x866px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1658x866px

>>7675744

>>7677390
why doesn't /lit/ like Marlowe?

>>7675744
Read "Beginners" and you'll shuffle Carver over to the Bukowski end.

>>7676831
>>7676843
>>7676856
>>7677318
plebes located

>>7677338
That was a goddamn beautiful Comeback.

>>7677715
Because they can't think of anything interesting to say about Shakespeare and he's the only other writer of the period they're familiar with. Faust, Hero and Leander, Edward II, The Jew of Malta, Tamburlaine, and Dido are all fantastic.

>>7677715
>>7677778

Read the filename bimbos

Tried to not be obvious but geez

File: Film_Edition.jpg (1MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4160x2340px

Western film edition

File: 1455050935553.jpg (1MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4160x2340px

>>7679706
you wish, pseud

>implying I know any of these people

>>7679718
>tfw when I actually am pseudo

Who are the others there?

>>7677390
well done

File: 1454959717984.png (3MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2340px

>>7679747
+Soviet edition

>>7679753
>>7679718
>>7679706
Not a film person, I know Jean-Luc Godard, Warhol and Christopher Nolan (the latter by name; I've only seen his Batman movies and that was enough). Who are the others? I am interested occasionally in art film.

>>7675744
shit thread m8
Not all of us waste our time looking at author photos, and with the format you can't reverse image search accurately

>>7677732
>read this story that is an unedited version of a better story
Good post.

>>7679767
>>7679706
Nolan, Godard, Bergman

>>7679718
The first is Bergman, but is that really Warhol in the middle? I saw the similarity but didn't think the post was just for banter. If it is Warhol, the third mustn't be worthwhile.

>>7679753
Tarkovski, Paradjanov, Vertov.

>>7679793
nah dude switch tolstoy and Nabby

>>7679767
The only good film out of Nolan was Memento.

>>7679718
Bergman, Warhol, Brakhage

>>7679860
>>7679860
Swap Kant and Hegel and this accurate.

>>7681310
Yes comrade

>>7679718
Patrician should be Michelangelo Antioni Tbh.

>>7681310
Switch Trump with Sanders and I would agree with it. Also Yeb could count as Plebeian.

>>7681386
why is he making the isis hand

>>7681376
>not Kalatozov

>>7681390
Because he was a Nazi and ISIS hates Jews too.

>>7679780
No, I mean the whole book "Beginners". It shows how bad those stories were before the editor cut them into something admirable.

>>7681391
He would be on the Soviet edition. >>7679753

>>7676805
Jung and Freud should be swapped my dude

>>7676315
>2016
>still thinking Hegel's legacy has ANYTHING to offer

Agreed on Rand though, it's the same kind of cancer as Marx is, only opposite. In short - unworthy of a grown man's attention.

>>7681400
why don't they attack israel then my blue-pilled friend?

WHAT THE FLYING FUCK IS WITH ALL THE COMMIES

Seriously, people here think Marx, or Freud, or fucking Bernie Sanders are worth anything?

File: 1444616617919.jpg (132KB, 891x670px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 891x670px

>>7681960

>>7679860
Mill, plebian or nor, is relevant today more than Hegel and Kant

>>7681960
Freud a shit but you gotta admit that the novelty and thoroughness of his approach makes him sort of relevant. Same goes for Marx, except that he's got good ideas as well (rejecting Hegel and God to name a few)
Sanders is a politician, no new ideas and no worth, but has somewhat of an edge on other politicians in that he manages to sound sincere?

>>7681960
yes

>>7681310

eh nah go for Kasich he's nice

File: literally who.png (40KB, 538x143px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 538x143px

>>7682202
>throwing your vote away

literally nobody knows who this man is

>>7682025
haha no

>>7681386
Zizek is based as fuck though

>>7682202
Jeb is a lot nicer than Kasich, although also a wasted vote.

>>7679753
muh nigga

File: 1452454963443.gif (2MB, 200x293px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x293px

>>7679718
>Warhol
>Brakhage

Why are they in the same picture with a legitimate filmmaker?

>>7682269
Why not? Cant understand the analytics?

>>7682232

Same was the case for Lincoln and HW Bush and Clinton I and Carter and...

>>7679753
what are their best movies?

>>7682284
this shitter...

>>7679826
>implying The Prestige isn't good

I'd even throw Batman Begins in there.

>>7682374
Tarkovsky - The Mirror
Paradjanov - Shadows of our ancestors
Vertov - Man with a movie camera

>>7682377
Do elaborate on this

Did you mean "This, shitter" as in you agree with >>7682284

Or are you a retard with no taste

>>7682388
thanks family

>>7682393
i can agree on warhol, but not on based brakky

>>7682399
Pretending to like Brakhage isn't going to win you any points on 4chan where nobody knows who the fuck you are.

>>7682404
you're right, so then i wouldn't be pretending, would i?

>>7682374
I'd say every Tarkovsky film is a masterpiece and I suggest all seven of them, but I think Stalker is the greatest.
Paradjanov's best would be Color of the Pomegranades.
Vertov's undeniable masterpiece is of course Man with a Movie Camera.

>>7682388

Eh Andrei Rublyev is probably Tark's real masterpiece

plebeian: likes a handful of canonical writers with a few mediocrities mixed in; prone to accepting common misreadings and seeing the history of literature as progressing from strict arbitrary rules to free expression

contrarian: comes in many varieties, including:
-believes many talented and brilliant women writers have been cruelly denied eminent positions in the canon and deserve to be ranked among the best of their period
-maintains that all great literature is at bottom atheistical or 'daemonic' in some way, and every great writer was shocking and misunderstood in his own time
-thinks literature has lost its way some time between the renaissance and the modernists, and that all good literature must be moral
-is absolutely certain that at least half of the canonical writers are vastly overrated hacks, including Shakespeare

Patrician: this I don't know. I'm just a shitposter on 4chan. All I can say for sure is that the patrician reads a lot.

File: 1453916954497.gif (2MB, 235x180px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 235x180px

>>7679718
Having Warhol, who did plastic anti-art and pop-pictures for money top Bergman, who was and is objectivly the single greatest cinematic person to ever live discredits you as a person

>>7679718
>you wish, pseud
>Warhol

Top fucking kek

File: Näyttökuva (70).png (124KB, 812x962px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 812x962px

>>7682412
I think Tarkovsky is a pretty cool guy. Eh fights back at soviet censors and doesn't afraid of anything

File: aristotle-quotes-on-women.jpg (70KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 850x400px

>>7683255
She said that her only inspiration and teacher was Aristoteles and I think that she proved him right in one thing.

Women are intellectually uncomplete men

>>7682388
>Man with a movie camera
brilliant stuff

>>7675801
who is this guy on patrician?

>>7683289
I agree except I think men are incomplete women

File: smug.jpg (4KB, 130x130px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 130x130px

>>7682025
Can someone make a shop of Hume doing pic related, I want to spam it on /sci/

>>7675801
obviously. look at the ignorant cocksucker look in that 20 year old's glimmering darwin eyes. then go to the mad gettysburg motherfucker who's been through shit, lived through shit and wrote to tell of whom shoulders we stand on.

cut back to the glittering cocksucker on the left

>plebian
McCarthy
>contrarian
Melville
>patrician
Faulkner

File: Plato.jpg (25KB, 216x296px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 216x296px

>>7681379
>Implying trump isn't the definition of contrarian

>>7682277
also if you vote for jeb you might save a life

>Plebeian
Turgenjev
>Contrarian
Tolstoj
>Patrician
Dostojevski & Gogol

>>7682001
>>7681288

How to Expose Yourself as Under-Read, and Stupid

>>7684274
that man might really kill himself if he loses

File: AVIDeyv.jpg (92KB, 544x626px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 544x626px

>>7684618
>liking tolstoy is contrarian
>dostoyevsky is not a contrarian

you do not know fucking ANYTHING about russian literature in history context, do you
you do not know anything ab