When was this printed?

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
When was this printed? 2016-01-17 20:27:58 Post No. 7596441
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: DSC_0005 (1).jpg (1MB, 3104x1746px) Image search: [Google]

When was this printed? Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:27:58 Post No. 7596441 [Report]

Got this copy in a local charity shop, trying to find out when it was printed, seeing as it's not said anywhere inside the book.

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:30:53 Post No.7596447
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:30:53 Post No.7596447 [Report]

>>7596441
>meem keyboard
>can't even find printing date
Please go back to you know where

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:31:40 Post No.7596449
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:31:40 Post No.7596449 [Report]

File: DSC_0008 (1).jpg (1MB, 3104x1746px) Image search: [Google]

This is the page showing the printing company "butler &Tanner Ltd.". It was published by "Ward, Lock and Co."

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:35:06 Post No.7596455
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:35:06 Post No.7596455 [Report]

>>7596447
Senpai, I've looked everywhere in this book and there is no printing date to be seen.

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:40:09 Post No.7596468
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:40:09 Post No.7596468 [Report]

>>7596441
FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING SLUT

KILL YOUR SELF

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:46:08 Post No.7596489
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:46:08 Post No.7596489 [Report]

>>7596441
http://www.worldcat.org/title/count-of-monte-cristo/oclc/48135064

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:46:33 Post No.7596492
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:46:33 Post No.7596492 [Report]

>>7596449
https://fromemuseum.wordpress.com/collection/printing/butler-and-tanner/

Some time after 1923 because that's when they became Ltd.

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:48:04 Post No.7596498
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:48:04 Post No.7596498 [Report]

>>7596489
Cheers man, I probably should've been more patient in my googling.

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:49:24 Post No.7596500
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:49:24 Post No.7596500 [Report]

>>7596492
Ah, still much older than I was expecting the copy to have been.