What's the difference for Kant between to think and to know?

I think you know you kant know

>muh noumena

>>7404659
You seem to know. Do you could help me where can I find the resolution to my problem?

File: Mahna.jpg (100KB, 656x472px)

100KB, 656x472px

>>7404659
Do doo, do doo doo

File: 1428783436493.png (228KB, 398x297px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 398x297px

>>7404677

>>7404671

it's a hard question to answer

the tl;dr is that kant's epistemology is still debated

read this http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-judgment/#KanVer

>>7404659
>>7404677
>>7404679
oh you

File: almost.jpg (15KB, 340x115px)

15KB, 340x115px

>>7404752

>>7404646
Knowing is a subset of thinking.
Within thinking there are judgments.
A judgment is either subjective or objective.
Knowing is an objective judgment.
It is to assert that S is P necessarily and universally.

That's what Kant would say about that.

>>7404773
Thanks! Do you know where i can find this in the Critique? The passage in which it is located.

>>7404804
Yeah, section 22 of the transcendental deduction around B 146.

Knowing might be translated "cognizing" and knowledge, "cognition," and so on.

>>7404823
Thank you so much!

>>7404823
Just more one question. Kant looks refer to pure form and pure intuition like the same thing. They can be treated as equals?

>>7404876
I want to say yes. Though it seems like if it's a question on your homework, the answer would be no.

He almost always talks about pure spatio-temporal forms of intuition, so if there is a difference, it is very subtle.

>>7404646
We can't know something outside the categories. We can think about fairies, gods, etc, but not KNOW them.