Is Sam Harris arguably the greatest thinker of our time? It seems

>>7353342
>>>/r/eddit
>>>/trash/
>>>/lgbt/

>>7353345
you forgot
>>>/his/
>>>/pol/

>>7353342
Definitely. He clearly destroyed Chomsky. An absolute genius. Indeed, he is a miracle.

>>7353342
hail caliph harris

File: images.jpg (7KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 259x194px

I like he's doing stuff about meditation, because I'd like to get into that myself.

But as a writer and public figure, does he have a sincere purpose? I'm not sure because some of his presence feels like just being aimed at getting to be known - but I see he's got a wife already. (I secretly project all writers just do it for audience pussy.)

He's very intelligent, as both his degree and arguments support. However, he is a very boring public speaker. The skill of oration is needed in a public figure.

>>7353342
>Atheist
>Great thinker

You get to pick one, anon.

I like what Sam Harris seems to be about. Seems like at the core he's a good guy, it's a shame he spouts so much shit desu

>>7354063
>retard
>you
Pick both.

>>7354063
>implying that atheists aren't better off than delusional religious folks like you

>>7353342
this picture is waaay too small for a sam harris thread, family

>>7353342
I like the fact that unlike Hitchens, he is more objective and has a friendlier touch when exposing his thoughts. And unlike Dawkins, he is not completely focused in throwing shit at religions.

>>7353345
dont fucking group trannies with sam harris, thats an insult to trannies