Waman are oppressed

>>10031771
Quality thread, OP.

Hey OP, how about spending one day in your life without a cock in your mouth?

> a dystopia in which women are purely a gynecological resource because their wombs have intrinsic reproductive value
ugh yaaaas this book is soo important!

> meanwhile in the real world, sex robots and artificial wombs appear, finally challenging the gynecological monopoly one half of the population holds over the other
fucking patriarchy

>>10031946
artificial vaginas deserve equal rights as well

>>10031964

Okay, what rights do we give the artificial vagina? Considerations include that it lacks a pulse, much less a nervous system, much less sentence.

Ethically speaking, viruses have a better claim to legal rights.

>>10032966
Can you just fuck off?

>>10032966
>>10032976
bumping out of sheer reactionary misogyny

File: harrypotterbooks.jpg (69KB, 500x439px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 500x439px

>>10031771
This is now a Harry Potter thread
Anti-Harry Potter cucks not allowed

it's not even a bad book

>>10033562
But retarded feminists take it seriously

>>10033562
It was pretty bad desu

>>10033562
>a van takes Offred away
>"we found some tapes but we don't know how to arrange them"
>finds freedom in smoking, an addiction, which COULDVE been poetic if she died from lung cancer or something

The entire premise is retarded as well. 30% of all Protestant clergy in America are women.

>>10031771
Kill yourself.

>>10035023
>30% of all Protestant clergy in America are women.
>Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
fucking lmao

>>10031771
>suggests women aren't oppressed by oppressing women

>>10035054
Laughing at a trash book and everyone who likes it is oppressing women?

>>10035045
modern day mainline protestants are basically generic progs though. abortion and sodomy ascended to the level of sacraments after protestant and liberal theologies underwent fusion post 60s

File: 30handmaids1_xp-jumbo.jpg (125KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1024x683px

>>10031771
the handmaid's tale is not a dystopia but a female fantasy. The woman trapped inside every feminist cries out for male domination. The shallowness of wonder woman feminism is just a cover for daddy issues

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/30/us/handmaids-protests-abortion.html

No, women aren't oppressed, but they should be. I consider "The Handmaid's Tale" a work of utopian fiction.

>>10031946
artificial wombs aren't real yet are they?

>>10035246
correctamundo