this shit good?

I don't know, OP, but if I were you and had opinions about what was good and what wasn't—you know: basic opinions about any work of art or thought—what I would do to determine whether or not the work is, as you put it, "good" is to read the book and decide for myself, not waste the time of forum-goers by asking a banal, general, vacuous question, whether or not it is good.

You can easily find the work on libgen at http://gen.lib.rus.ec. Check it out for yourself. Bataille is an interesting other and worth your time. Try not to ask such bullshit in the future.

>>10030286
I know Bataille. Could you guys tell me more avout what he specifically discusses in this book?

>>10030463
Check his Wikipedia for more info, anon. In short, he's interested in transgressive sexuality, immorality, religious defiance, taboo everything, etc. He was an iconoclast and inflammatory writer. A lot of his writing is intended to provoke, and even if many of his passages function in more profound terms, a lot of his writing is provocative for its sake. I recommend it.