I have the uncorrected version with the error on page 139-140. Should I bother reading it? I've never heard of any other major errors in the deluxe besides that one.
only time I've seen any reference to other errors was from the amazon review that claimed several errors in the first 100pgs. I haven't noticed any though.
>>10027872
>>10027941
any evidence for other errors?
>>10027941
That is the most retarded thing I have ever read
>>10027974
You don't sound very smart then.
But, OP, that edition is fine. Thousands of people have read it and enjoyed it. I have never seen proof of other errors besides that hap [pens error. I've also heard new prints of it have fixed it.
Sometimes Pynchon's slang words freak me out and I think they're typos.
In the first 75 pages I got startled by "terrif" and "ridic" but they're both supposed to be there
>>10028097
Makes you question some things about what's "real" about real words.
I read somewhere that other versions of GR have actually more errors than the penguin deluxe, save for the sentence omission on 139.