*singlehandedly saves western thought from itself* heh,

Because if you can't solve the is/ought problem, just speak as if it doesn't exist and no one will say a word

>>>/tv/

File: 1440769500370.jpg (13KB, 620x349px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 620x349px

>>10014868
problem?

>>10015150
Yes problem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7EbP0GU_4M&t=116s

>>10015150
>can't have an ought from an is
>SCIENCE SAYS WE SHOULD ALL BE BUDDHIST HUMANISTS
Yeah, that is a problem. It's called hypocricy.

>>10014868
>>10015153
Do you have that hilarious comic of Harris fighting Hume with his other New Wave Atheist buddies?

File: Trigger_warning.jpg (424KB, 920x2492px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 920x2492px

>>10015159

>>10015161
Bless you

File: images (94).jpg (11KB, 516x285px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 516x285px

>>10015163
I don't need your childish "blessings" you backwater retard I am fucking euphoric right now.

File: Sleeping-Pills-Dormicum.jpg (59KB, 406x316px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 406x316px

>>10014862

>his voices is doing the same job for me but not in a pleasant way.


Voice modulation is 1 very important part of language and its practical execution should be tought as such in order to fulfill Logos mission in the most effective and aesthetically way.

He miserable fails regarding his voice modulation or he intentionally is using his "soft" voice as a form of rhetoric to appear morally superior and trigger the hell out of me. Upboat if you cant handle his softener impregnated voice.

t. Ad hominem but it was not avoidable.

>>10015173
I disagree with a lot of what Harris says, particularly philosophically, but I genuinely enjoy listening to his voice talk about anything

Works on me, anon

>>10015184
And are you "loud and proud" or still in the closet?

>>10015217
Woud and crowded

>>10014862
*attempts to "save" western though"
*slips on a banana peel*

File: sh.png (70KB, 859x936px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 859x936px

>>10014862
As much as he's a pseud, I can't hate the guy because he triggers his own reddit fanbase.

>>10015173
found the faggot nerd

>>10015153
Considering what buddhists are doing in Myanmar maybe he is right

He never claimed to solve the is ought problem. He says we start with the ought that we value our own wellbeing, and we can derive other oughts from this ought, that is, if we value our wellbeing, we can measure the value of other things in terms of how much wellbeing they give us.

be honest, if i offered to trade his life in return for bringing Christopher Hitchens back to life you'd take the trade.

shit, you'd take the trade if I offered to bring Phil Hartman back.

>>10015161

>dennett is an eliminativist about mental events
>he doesn't understand heterophenomenology

reminder that undergrad continental snarklords aren't scholars

>>10016949

can you bring back chris farley

File: CHRISTOPHER-HITCHE_2090241c.jpg (26KB, 460x287px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 460x287px

>>10016949
Well, you see comrade, I'm still very much alive.

I'm having drinks with Trotsky and the good Doctor Johnson as we speak. There's a fine and neverending selection of fine liquor and booze here in... - oh, what's that? Mother Teresa is blind drunk and arm wrestling that old queen John Francis? This I got to see!

>>10016993
Giving a concept a nine syllable label doesn't make it any less mistaken.

>>10017000
That would take about five Sam Harris'.

>>10016932
Name 1 (one) philosophy or religion in which its adherrents never committed horrible acts

>>>/tv/

>>10017055
Buddhists, they are doing the right thing

>>10017060
>khmer rouge was a good thing
what did he mean by this?

Does he literally just ignores Hume's law, or has he ever tried to refute it?

>>10017060
You're disgusting. Even if you are "joking".

>>10017055
Um, Mormons maybe? Although they did do that whole digging up Jewish Holocaust victims and baptising them "thing".

>>10017151

He derives an ought from an ought in his book The Moral Landscape, he doesn't try to refute Hume. People just read the subtitle of the book and think they know what he means.

>>10017172
>People just read the subtitle of the book and think they know what he means.

Isnt this what /lit/ is about?

>>10016463
why did I laugh at this

>>10017972
It's funny.

>>10017060
I'm a Buddhist and I think you're wrong. Look at Imperial Japan, or even Feudal Japan. Compassion was handwaved away with vague references to anatta.
Buddhism is not about a "people". The self is somewhat dubious, let alone such religious group identities.

>>10017064
The Khmer Rouge suppressed Buddhism, as did Chinese Maoists.

>>10017163
>joking is disgusting
Why do you have to be a thoughtless parody of politically correct totalitarianism?

>>10017060
Yes, let's train more soldiers to not fear death so they can fight properly!

File: 1503864606816.jpg (66KB, 1278x1181px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1278x1181px

>>10017060
>buddhists have never committed horrible acts

>>10016932
this desu.

>>10016947
>He says we start with the ought that we value our own wellbeing
the most dubious ought of all time

>>10017163
>>10017163
Killing muslims is a beautiful thing

>>10017060
>this is what white "people" actually believe

>>10016947
does this guy think he invented utilitarianism?

lmao!

>>10017060
yeah lol