>less expensive and less damaging to mother gaia and her living children
>intrinsically acknowledges its condition as a temporary receptacle of the human vision which is ever changing
>accepting of its demise with grace unlike (((e-books))) who will be forgotten
>analog medium ensures that it can be accessed by everyone across economic strata thereby ensuring equality amongst the classes
>will not destroy your back when you move
I have seen the light and acknowledge the inherent superiority of paperbacks.
>uses price and weight as an argument
>paperbacks somehow win
>>10014564
>will not destroy your back when you move
My heaviest textbooks I ever had to carry around for school were both paperbacks.
If you want specifics, Stokstad and Hart's art history books.