>>10014054
pathetic self bump
Wordsworth pretty much lead the field on this one, because their art is done on the cheap. To be fair to them, their latest editions seem to be much better.
>>10014493
>Wordsworth
they look quite decent i would say
>>10014493
I like this cover
>>10014540
>A PET BOOK
>>10014054
this is the worst cover which i own. there are so many wrongs: the gun, the vodka, the awkward chair. the book, however, is one of my favs
>>10014594
oy fucking gevalt
>>10014493
I think they're not even trying anymore
>>10014601
I have the middle one. Doesn't really fit the tone of the book but it's ok.
>>10014054
>>10014694
What the fuck kind of book award does that sticker denote
>>10014630
Weirdly enough I have one that has the painting on the first one and the text/frame of the second one. I kinda wish they'd gone for the obvious and just put a picture of a young Joyce like Penguin Classics did
I was so pissed when I got this cover instead of the one I ordered
Yugoslavian edition of Less Than Zero
>>10014054
My copy of the Art of War by Sun Tzu has, no kidding, a japanese feudal drawing of a samurai on the cover
>>10015232
Who would tell those little yellow fucks apart?
>>10014944
this rules
>>10015253
How is that bad?
>>10014054
Life, uhh, finds a way.
>>10015252
Anyone who's not a brainlet
>>10015542
t. weeb
>>10015439
>change really bugged him
>>10014493
that cover is pure badassery
>>10014540
where do you degenerates find stuff like this?
>>10014594
looks like a fur-suiter on a floating chair
>>10014944
fuckin' bitchin' dude
I'm trying to remember, there was a set of a whole bunch of really shitty ones made by the same illustrator posted in one of these threads a little while ago.
Does anyone know what I'm talking about?
dover thrift are always bad
literally any recent Wordsworth Classics book.