http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3671887/Surrogate-mother-agreed-birth-baby-gay-couple-met-Burger-King-wins-custody-boy-judge-finds-manipulated-exploited.html
When will the /lgbt/ community revert the trainwreck that is womens rights? Will they never admit their mistake?
>LGBT
>women's rights
Two different movements bud
>>8861304
you mean the left
Yawn.
>>8861304
Women's rights are the biggest mistake in history.
>>8861304
>couldn't consent because of learning disability
>better match for the baby
>>8862477
It's hard to deny this, as much I'd like to ideologically.
>>8862614
What ideology?
>A judge ruled she couldn't 'freely' consent due to learning difficulties
>learning difficulties
>learning difficulties
Wouldn't THIS be exactly the reason NOT to give her that kid?
Wouldn't it also be a reason for legalizing "retroactive abortions" and promptly abort that surrogate mother? Just a suggestion of an armchair legislator.
I feel contempt not for the white trash surrogate womb but the entire Bri'ish legal system.
I don't need to hope for it since it's going to happen anyway, only to sit back and enjoy the sight of Pakis, Muslims and other shitskins "Limeys" historically exploited in a karmic justice dismantling that inbred rotten teeth island to pieces.
>>8862665
As far as reasons to hold the UK's legal system in contempt go, this is nothing.
Of course the judge was a Hon.
>>8862717
UHHMMM is this real
>>8861304
>Not making her sign a legal agreement.
This is where they messed up, if they don't put her under contract then it doesn't matter what promises she makes because she's not legally bound to uphold them.
The other problem was trying to use a surrogate when the UK's surrogate laws are shit.
>>8862843
>implying contracts in any jurisdiction would hold up against feminist judges and "exploited, manipulated, mentally incapable" women