Non-monogamy is a mental disorder

>>8779721
>The reason why men and boys are more likely to be non-committal is because of misandry in society that sees men as disposable
Explain the connection?

>>8779757
You don't want to give emotional support to someone if you want them to be able to go out and kill enemies and make tough decisions (at least in the eyes of most normies) or to die in order to save those precious women ("women and children first" as well as most people would rather kill a man than a woman in the trolley problem).

>>8779773
But then how does that turn them poly?

>polygamy
How would such a divorce case look like?

>>8779792
Because you don't allow them to be emotional. "Boys don't cry", "man up", ect basically what feminists call toxic masculinity being pushed onto young, impressionable boys so that they can grow up to be unfeeling, harsh men. This conditioning leads boys to not be able to feel like they can express emotion (that's the point) which leads to them being stunted in their ability to form relationships. This, basically, is the reason why fascism puts such a high value on extreme masculinity, you have to be able to kill and be disposed of for the sake of the country without anyone feeling as much remorse as they do when women are killed. You can see this disposability of men a lot when you realize you should be aware of it, like when they report civilian casualties as "153 civilian casualties today, including 30 women and children" or many of the people who push the idea that we should allow Syrian refugees except for single men, if you are a man in society your life is valued less than your female counterparts regardless of age.

>>8779819
But why does being unable to form relationships = becoming poly?

I want a poly relationship so I have people who I do have relationships with. I want an opposite sex best partner and a same sex best friend and for all three of us to be a relationship. Is that stunted? To me it feels the opposite, above normal desire to form relationships.

>>8779819
>>8779841
Me again, being unable to form relationships should mean casual sex. Clubbing and hookers. Not a poly household of more than two romantic partners.

I agree to a certain point. I do not think that relationships containing 3 or more people can work because it is hard for each individual to connect to the other two where in a mono relationship it is much easier. I would not go so far to call it a mental disorder, but I still wouldn't like a poly relationship

>>8779841
Two questions
>1.how are sure that you didn't end up preferring a poly relationship because of childhood emotional neglect or something else?
>2. How is that different from having two entirely separate relationships with two different people?
I'm willing to admit I was wrong here if I'm proven wrong, and maybe I was wrong to include polyamorous people in the same category as open relationships (which I could be wrong on as well, who knows)

>>8779855
>how are sure that you didn't end up preferring a poly relationship because of childhood emotional neglect or something else?
Honestly I'm not. If it is for that reason though, then it's less because I can't form relationships and more because I desperately want them.

>How is that different from having two entirely separate relationships with two different people?
I guess it's like the difference between having two separate friends and two friends who you do things with both at the same time. But for relationships. It's important for me that they are together too so that my same sex best friend has the same kind of relationship with our partner as I do. I don't really know why but it feels really important to it.

>open relationships
I don't desire that for myself but I'd be happy for my two partners to have that. Like, it's between them if that's alright for one or both of them. My approval can be taken for granted.