/tttt/'s opinion on execution?

>fragile masculinity

It's good to see that trans panic isn't a viable defense.

Have fun getting assfucked by hung trannies in hell.

>>8774037
>Have fun getting assfucked by hung trannies in hell.
I wonder what those trannies did for that to be their punishment.

>>8774037
You know, for shit like this, I really hope there is a hell.

And I hope those hontastic hell-trannies have enormous sulfuric acid loads and barbed dicks.

>>8774065
god doesnt like trannies either anon

>>8773774
I don't think it's ever right to execute someone but I won't cry over him.

>>8773774
We should have a constitutional amendment enshrining gay marriage and adoption in exchange for criminalizing trannies with death.

>>8778202
>We should have a constitutional amendment enshrining gay marriage
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obergefell_v._Hodges
?

>>8778237
That is a court decision.

>>8778241
whats the difference?

>>8778286
A court decision can be amended by precedent, a constitutional amendment requires"

A two-thirds (supermajority) vote of members present—assuming that a quorum exists—in both the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States Congress; or
A two-thirds (supermajority) vote of a national convention called by Congress at the request of the legislatures of at least two-thirds (at present 34) of the states. (This method has never been used.)

>>8778295
thats wrong tho, both methods apply to both

>>8778306
What, no? Court decisions are much easier to reverse than constitutional amendments.

>>8773774
I mean, the government could just ask me if I want to shoot people like this in the back of the head and I'd say yes.

Bullets are cheap and I'd become like the grim reaper but for retards like this.

>>8778329
uh, no? scotus and two-thirds of states are the only ways to to do an amendment/scotus ruling and the only ways to reverse them.

literally exactly the same.

>>8778357
Would be much harder and stranger for SCOTUS to rule an AMENDMENT to the Constitution unconstitutional.

>>8778369
scotus passes more than it repeals, same as the two-thirds do.

>>8778394
It is much harder to organize 2/3 of states hence much harder to repeal anything they pass. The Supreme Court has NEVER overturned a constitutional amendment and doing so would put their power in jeopardy as an amendment is by law the will of the people.

>>8778408
don't you read their rulings? they do whenever they want.

>>8778415
They have never overturned a constitutional amendment.

>>8778443
do you know how often they overturn any federal law?

>>8777545
this tbhon

>>8778443
[citation needed]

>>8778556
There are only so many. We would know if they had overturned one.

>>8778561
you apparently don't.

>>8778614
Ok which one was overturned by the Supreme Court?

>>8778641
let's hear how you'd know first. because you wouldn't.

>>8778675
Wut? Because you could go to the wikipedia page for that amendment and see that the Supreme Court has overturned it...

>>8778706
>i know it's true because i read wikipedia pages i have no reason to know exist and have never looked for

>>8778721
There's only 27 of them. I feel like I would have read it if one of them were overturned by a court. It has never happened.

>>8778798
>i feel
>i read wikipedia
literally your arguments.

the only entirely overturned one i know of isn't one of the 27, obviously.

>>8778812
ok then what are you talking about?

>>8778845
your ignorance of us law and politics, mostly.

>>8778900
What am I ignorant of specifically? You are dancing around whatever point you think you have.

>>8778924
you think the limit of what you've hear and "feel" is the limit of what there is.

you think the law and history are the wiki pages you happen to have skimmed.

that's all.

>>8778949
Can you explain to me where specifically I am wrong on the law?

>>8778969
you think theres a difference between scotus rulings and the constitution. that's literally all it is.

>>8774075
You do realize that this essentially makes you the exactly the same right

To actually be superior or deserving of being treated better than this you would actually have to be better

you need to kill them not so that they suffer, so that you can be vindicated, so that you can have catharsis and relief, but so that they literally cease to exist and impact the world. To have emotions for them, even hatred, is to in a way internalize a part of them into yourself and love them as a fellow human being.

I cannot express to you how much of a grave mistake this is. You must not love your enemy, you must destroy him without sentiment. If you truly understand him, then all you should feel is disgust, like a cockroach that crawls near the mouth of an infant.

>>8778974
Scotus has never overturned a Constitutional amendment. They are to interpret it, not to redefine it.

>>8779046
you're wrong and so wrong that you don't even notice it and don't know american law and politics.